PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CROX vs. HUBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CROX vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 41.65% return, which is significantly higher than HUBS's -56.82% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed HUBS with an annualized return of 27.30%, while HUBS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.45% annualized return.


CROX

1D
-2.15%
1M
9.69%
YTD
41.65%
6M
34.63%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
27.30%

HUBS

1D
0.28%
1M
-14.20%
YTD
-56.82%
6M
-56.35%
1Y
-67.70%
3Y*
-30.32%
5Y*
-21.69%
10Y*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CROX vs. HUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
41.65%-21.92%17.26%-13.85%-15.43%104.63%49.58%61.24%105.54%84.26%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
-56.82%-42.41%20.02%100.79%-56.14%66.27%150.12%26.06%42.23%88.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CROX and HUBS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between CROX and HUBS has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CROX:

$6.14B

HUBS:

$9.11B

EPS

CROX:

-$1.94

HUBS:

$1.91

PS Ratio

CROX:

1.61

HUBS:

2.77

PB Ratio

CROX:

4.30

HUBS:

4.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

CROX:

$4.02B

HUBS:

$3.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CROX:

$2.34B

HUBS:

$2.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

CROX:

$297.04M

HUBS:

$196.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CROX vs. HUBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CROX
CROX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CROX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

HUBS
HUBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CROX vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CROXHUBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.76

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

-0.98

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

-1.63

+2.91

CROX vs. HUBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CROX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the HUBS Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CROX and HUBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CROX vs. HUBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than HUBS's maximum drawdown of -79.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and HUBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CROXHUBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.74%

-79.72%

-19.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.54%

-69.19%

+36.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.04%

-78.92%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.86%

-79.72%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

-79.72%

+4.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.91%

-79.66%

+46.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.25%

-23.32%

-37.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.14%

41.61%

-22.47%

Volatility

CROX vs. HUBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) is 11.21%, while HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that CROX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CROXHUBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.21%

25.64%

-14.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.50%

54.73%

-22.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.45%

62.98%

-10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.17%

54.98%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.01%

50.94%

+5.07%

Dividends

CROX vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CROX nor HUBS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CROX vs. HUBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crocs, Inc. and HubSpot, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
921.46M
881.00M
(CROX) Total Revenue
(HUBS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CROX vs. HUBS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crocs, Inc. and HubSpot, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
56.8%
83.5%
Portfolio components
CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.

HUBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.

HUBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.

HUBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CROX and HUBS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUBS has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to CROX (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CROX dropped -98.74% vs HUBS's -79.72%.

CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CROX and HUBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer