CROX vs. LULU
Compare and contrast key facts about Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CROX or LULU.
Key characteristics
| CROX | LULU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 46.12% | -31.58% |
| 1Y Return | 16.91% | -8.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.83% | 1.95% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 41.90% | 15.07% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 25.02% | 23.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.40 | -0.29 |
| Daily Std Dev | 48.40% | 32.94% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.74% | -92.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.41% | -31.58% |
Fundamentals
| CROX | LULU | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.54B | $44.75B |
| EPS | $12.79 | $12.22 |
| PE Ratio | 9.72 | 29.06 |
| PEG Ratio | -31.83 | 1.27 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.96B | $9.62B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.86B | $4.49B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.10B | $2.59B |
Correlation
The correlation between CROX and LULU is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CROX vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 46.12% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -31.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed LULU with an annualized return of 25.02%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively lower 23.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CROX vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CROX vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CROX nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CROX vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than LULU's maximum drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CROX vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a higher volatility of 11.93% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 7.12%. This indicates that CROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CROX vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crocs, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities