PortfoliosLab logo
CROX vs. LULU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CROX and LULU is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CROX vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CROX:

-0.33

LULU:

-0.11

Sortino Ratio

CROX:

-0.21

LULU:

0.02

Omega Ratio

CROX:

0.97

LULU:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

CROX:

-0.38

LULU:

-0.16

Martin Ratio

CROX:

-0.70

LULU:

-0.43

Ulcer Index

CROX:

27.36%

LULU:

20.31%

Daily Std Dev

CROX:

52.87%

LULU:

44.50%

Max Drawdown

CROX:

-98.74%

LULU:

-92.26%

Current Drawdown

CROX:

-34.90%

LULU:

-37.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CROX:

$6.59B

LULU:

$38.62B

EPS

CROX:

$16.25

LULU:

$14.64

PE Ratio

CROX:

7.23

LULU:

21.96

PEG Ratio

CROX:

-31.83

LULU:

1.32

PS Ratio

CROX:

1.61

LULU:

3.65

PB Ratio

CROX:

3.34

LULU:

9.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

CROX:

$4.10B

LULU:

$8.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CROX:

$2.43B

LULU:

$5.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

CROX:

$1.07B

LULU:

$2.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -15.94% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed LULU with an annualized return of 22.23%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively lower 17.96% annualized return.


CROX

YTD

7.32%

1M

29.57%

6M

20.22%

1Y

-16.60%

5Y*

35.22%

10Y*

22.23%

LULU

YTD

-15.94%

1M

28.02%

6M

0.45%

1Y

-4.03%

5Y*

4.70%

10Y*

17.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CROX vs. LULU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CROX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CROX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CROX is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CROX is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CROX is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CROX is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CROX is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

LULU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LULU is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LULU is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LULU is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LULU is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LULU is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LULU is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CROX vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CROX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CROX and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CROX vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CROX nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CROX vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than LULU's maximum drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CROX vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a higher volatility of 14.30% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 10.03%. This indicates that CROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CROX vs. LULU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crocs, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
937.33M
3.61B
(CROX) Total Revenue
(LULU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CROX vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crocs, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
57.8%
60.4%
(CROX) Gross Margin
(LULU) Gross Margin
CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 541.55M and revenue of 937.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.

LULU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 222.97M and revenue of 937.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

LULU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 160.10M and revenue of 937.33M, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.

LULU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 748.40M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.