PortfoliosLab logo
CROX vs. CRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CROX and CRT is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CROX vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CROX:

-0.32

CRT:

-0.52

Sortino Ratio

CROX:

0.02

CRT:

-0.46

Omega Ratio

CROX:

1.00

CRT:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

CROX:

-0.24

CRT:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

CROX:

-0.45

CRT:

-0.80

Ulcer Index

CROX:

27.16%

CRT:

23.72%

Daily Std Dev

CROX:

52.96%

CRT:

40.68%

Max Drawdown

CROX:

-98.74%

CRT:

-83.46%

Current Drawdown

CROX:

-34.18%

CRT:

-59.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CROX:

$6.66B

CRT:

$60.06M

EPS

CROX:

$16.21

CRT:

$0.95

PE Ratio

CROX:

7.33

CRT:

10.54

PEG Ratio

CROX:

-31.83

CRT:

0.00

PS Ratio

CROX:

1.62

CRT:

9.07

PB Ratio

CROX:

3.13

CRT:

24.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

CROX:

$4.10B

CRT:

$4.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CROX:

$2.43B

CRT:

$7.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

CROX:

$1.07B

CRT:

$4.23M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's 4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of 22.44%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.13% annualized return.


CROX

YTD

8.51%

1M

28.40%

6M

15.56%

1Y

-17.04%

5Y*

41.51%

10Y*

22.44%

CRT

YTD

4.09%

1M

-5.37%

6M

4.07%

1Y

-21.16%

5Y*

21.70%

10Y*

1.13%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CROX vs. CRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CROX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CROX is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CROX is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CROX is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CROX is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CROX is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CROX is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRT is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRT is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRT is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRT is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRT is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRT is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CROX vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CROX Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is higher than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CROX and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CROX vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
8.90%9.55%10.97%7.69%9.70%9.44%10.05%13.08%6.86%5.90%10.41%15.33%

Drawdowns

CROX vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CROX vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a higher volatility of 15.24% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 9.39%. This indicates that CROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CROX vs. CRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crocs, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
937.33M
1.46M
(CROX) Total Revenue
(CRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CROX vs. CRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crocs, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
57.8%
100.0%
(CROX) Gross Margin
(CRT) Gross Margin
CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 541.55M and revenue of 937.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.

CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 1.46M and revenue of 1.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 222.97M and revenue of 937.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 1.30M and revenue of 1.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 89.1%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 160.10M and revenue of 937.33M, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 1.32M and revenue of 1.46M, resulting in a net margin of 90.1%.