CROX vs. CRT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT).

Performance

CROX vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CROX vs. CRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CROX Crocs, Inc.	-2.29%	-21.92%	17.26%	-13.85%	-15.43%	104.63%	49.58%	61.24%	105.54%	84.26%
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	34.47%	-13.15%	-39.15%	-24.36%	145.90%	53.31%	5.38%	-13.04%	-17.93%	-12.70%

Fundamentals

EPS CROX : -$1.50 CRT : $0.74
PS Ratio CROX : 1.12 CRT : 11.35
Total Revenue (TTM) CROX : $4.04B CRT : $5.60M
Gross Profit (TTM) CROX : $2.36B CRT : $5.53M
EBITDA (TTM) CROX : $342.44M CRT : $4.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's 34.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of 24.42%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.09% annualized return.

CROX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 6M: -1.69%
• 1Y: -23.44%
• 3Y*: -12.90%
• 5Y*: 0.99%
• 10Y*: 24.42%

CRT

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 17.81%
• YTD: 34.47%
• 6M: 47.04%
• 1Y: -8.18%
• 3Y*: -10.70%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: 5.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CROX vs. CRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CROX

CROX Risk / Return Rank: 24
CROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CROX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CROX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

CRT

CRT Risk / Return Rank: 29
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CROX vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CROX	CRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	-0.24	-0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	-0.11	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.99	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	-0.35	-0.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	-0.55	-0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CROX vs. CRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CROX Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CROX and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CROX	CRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	-0.24	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.27	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.11	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.24	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between CROX and CRT is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CROX vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CROX Crocs, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	5.05%	9.41%	9.56%	10.96%	7.69%	9.71%	9.45%	10.04%	13.06%	6.87%	5.90%	10.41%

Drawdowns

CROX vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and CRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CROX	CRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.74%	-83.57%	-15.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.97%	-38.87%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.86%	-71.10%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.18%	-71.10%	-4.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.72%	-55.09%	+1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.45%	-29.27%	-32.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.80%	26.08%	-0.28%

Volatility

CROX vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) is 10.61%, while Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a volatility of 12.52%. This indicates that CROX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CROX	CRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.61%	12.52%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.87%	25.05%	+6.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.31%	34.93%	+21.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.50%	50.51%	+4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.92%	46.12%	+10.80%

Financials

CROX vs. CRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crocs, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 523.66M and revenue of 957.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.7%.

CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 717.33K and revenue of 774.28K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.7%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.40M and revenue of 957.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 440.59K and revenue of 774.28K, resulting in an operating margin of 56.9%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 105.17M and revenue of 957.64M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 453.32K and revenue of 774.28K, resulting in a net margin of 58.6%.