CROX vs. CRT
CROX (Crocs, Inc.) and CRT (Cross Timbers Royalty Trust) are both stocks. CROX operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical), while CRT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, CROX returned 32.09%/yr vs 2.40%/yr for CRT. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CROX vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 57.73% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's 33.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of 32.09%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.
CROX
- 1D
- 5.37%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 55.26%
- YTD
- 57.73%
- 1Y
- 38.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- 32.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.32%
CRT
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 14.55%
- 6M
- 22.41%
- YTD
- 33.07%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- -14.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | $151.35M | $139.69M | $141.20M |
| $148.46K | $137.40K | $200.55K |
CROX vs. CRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 57.73% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 104.63% | 49.58% | 61.24% | 105.54% | 84.26% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 33.07% | -13.15% | -39.15% | -24.36% | 145.90% | 53.31% | 5.38% | -13.04% | -17.93% | -12.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CROX and CRT is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2006 | 0.15 |
The correlation between CROX and CRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CROX:
$6.47B
CRT:
$61.02M
CROX:
$11.49
CRT:
$0.54
CROX:
11.74
CRT:
19.19
CROX:
0.24
CRT:
25.92
CROX:
1.72
CRT:
13.70
CROX:
4.89
CRT:
28.99
CROX:
$4.05B
CRT:
$4.50M
CROX:
$2.33B
CRT:
$4.33M
CROX:
$803.31M
CRT:
$3.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CROX vs. CRT — Risk / Return Rank
CROX
CRT
CROX vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CROX | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.04 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | 2.56 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CROX vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and CRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CROX | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.74% | -83.57% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.19% | -21.63% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.04% | -63.52% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.86% | -71.10% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.18% | -71.10% | -4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.30% | -55.56% | +30.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.07% | -29.53% | -31.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.03% | 9.05% | +7.98% |
Volatility
CROX vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a higher volatility of 13.52% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 8.78%. This indicates that CROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CROX | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.52% | 8.78% | +4.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.40% | 22.39% | +12.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.79% | 32.95% | +20.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.32% | 50.12% | +5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.57% | 46.08% | +9.49% |
Dividends
CROX vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 5.46% | 9.41% | 9.56% | 10.96% | 7.69% | 9.71% | 9.45% | 10.04% | 13.06% | 6.87% | 5.90% | 10.41% |
Financials
CROX vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crocs, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CROX vs. CRT - Profitability Comparison
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 700.71M and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
CRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 754.63K and revenue of 787.85K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 285.68M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.
CRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in an operating margin of 63.9%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 204.89M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
CRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in a net margin of 63.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CROX and CRT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CROX has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to CRT (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CROX dropped -98.74% vs CRT's -83.57%.
CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CROX and CRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer