PortfoliosLab logo
PBF vs. PSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PBF and PSX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PBF vs. PSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Phillips 66 (PSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PBF:

-1.08

PSX:

-0.46

Sortino Ratio

PBF:

-1.79

PSX:

-0.46

Omega Ratio

PBF:

0.78

PSX:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

PBF:

-0.75

PSX:

-0.37

Martin Ratio

PBF:

-1.35

PSX:

-1.13

Ulcer Index

PBF:

42.39%

PSX:

14.49%

Daily Std Dev

PBF:

51.79%

PSX:

34.55%

Max Drawdown

PBF:

-91.51%

PSX:

-64.21%

Current Drawdown

PBF:

-65.33%

PSX:

-28.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PBF:

$2.40B

PSX:

$48.35B

EPS

PBF:

-$9.01

PSX:

$4.44

PEG Ratio

PBF:

2.51

PSX:

0.78

PS Ratio

PBF:

0.08

PSX:

0.35

PB Ratio

PBF:

0.46

PSX:

1.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

PBF:

$31.54B

PSX:

$137.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PBF:

-$1.01B

PSX:

$8.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

PBF:

-$740.50M

PSX:

$5.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBF achieves a -20.70% return, which is significantly lower than PSX's 5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PBF has underperformed PSX with an annualized return of -0.25%, while PSX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.73% annualized return.


PBF

YTD

-20.70%

1M

34.91%

6M

-31.06%

1Y

-55.63%

5Y*

18.58%

10Y*

-0.25%

PSX

YTD

5.11%

1M

21.87%

6M

-5.57%

1Y

-15.67%

5Y*

15.63%

10Y*

7.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PBF vs. PSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PBF is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PBF is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PBF is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PBF is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PBF is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PBF is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

PSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PSX is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PSX is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PSX is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PSX is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PSX is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PSX is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PBF vs. PSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PBF Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the PSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBF and PSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PBF vs. PSX - Dividend Comparison

PBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than PSX's 3.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
5.05%3.86%1.93%0.49%0.00%4.23%3.83%3.67%3.39%4.30%3.26%4.50%
PSX
Phillips 66
3.88%3.95%3.15%3.68%5.00%5.15%3.14%3.60%2.70%2.84%2.67%2.64%

Drawdowns

PBF vs. PSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBF drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, which is greater than PSX's maximum drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBF and PSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PBF vs. PSX - Volatility Comparison

PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) has a higher volatility of 12.69% compared to Phillips 66 (PSX) at 10.18%. This indicates that PBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PBF vs. PSX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PBF Energy Inc. and Phillips 66. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
7.07B
30.43B
(PBF) Total Revenue
(PSX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PBF vs. PSX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PBF Energy Inc. and Phillips 66 over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-30.0%-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20212022202320242025
-6.0%
6.5%
(PBF) Gross Margin
(PSX) Gross Margin
PBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PBF Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of -420.20M and revenue of 7.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -6.0%.

PSX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips 66 reported a gross profit of 1.98B and revenue of 30.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.5%.

PBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PBF Energy Inc. reported an operating income of -511.20M and revenue of 7.07B, resulting in an operating margin of -7.2%.

PSX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips 66 reported an operating income of -395.00M and revenue of 30.43B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.

PBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PBF Energy Inc. reported a net income of -401.80M and revenue of 7.07B, resulting in a net margin of -5.7%.

PSX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips 66 reported a net income of 487.00M and revenue of 30.43B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.