PBF vs. MPC
PBF (PBF Energy Inc.) and MPC (Marathon Petroleum Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, PBF returned 15.33%/yr vs 27.17%/yr for MPC. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
PBF vs. MPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBF achieves a 170.44% return, which is significantly higher than MPC's 96.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PBF has underperformed MPC with an annualized return of 15.33%, while MPC has yielded a comparatively higher 27.17% annualized return.
PBF
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 51.18%
- 6M
- 119.20%
- YTD
- 170.44%
- 1Y
- 244.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 54.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.53%
MPC
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 18.82%
- 6M
- 81.21%
- YTD
- 96.32%
- 1Y
- 94.93%
- 3Y*
- 35.61%
- 5Y*
- 45.20%
- 10Y*
- 27.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $628.12M | $605.59M | $624.09M | |
| $225.84M | $191.30M | $141.72M |
PBF vs. MPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBF PBF Energy Inc. | 170.44% | 6.75% | -37.99% | 9.97% | 215.81% | 82.68% | -77.12% | 0.16% | -4.93% | 33.64% |
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 96.32% | 19.17% | -4.06% | 30.46% | 86.62% | 61.00% | -27.38% | 6.05% | -8.23% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBF and MPC is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2012 | 0.72 |
The correlation between PBF and MPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PBF:
$8.55B
MPC:
$92.39B
PBF:
$11.31
MPC:
$15.47
PBF:
6.39
MPC:
20.45
PBF:
0.02
MPC:
0.09
PBF:
0.25
MPC:
0.70
PBF:
1.37
MPC:
5.57
PBF:
$34.37B
MPC:
$135.75B
PBF:
$1.54B
MPC:
$11.95B
PBF:
$2.13B
MPC:
$12.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBF vs. MPC — Risk / Return Rank
PBF
MPC
PBF vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBF | MPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.43 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.67 | 4.91 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.39 | 13.76 | +1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBF vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBF drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, which is greater than MPC's maximum drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBF and MPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBF | MPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -79.67% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.86% | -18.33% | -16.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.04% | -44.75% | -31.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.04% | -44.75% | -31.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.51% | -79.67% | -11.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.03% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.63% | -17.20% | -20.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.08% | 6.56% | +8.52% |
Volatility
PBF vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison
PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) has a higher volatility of 20.64% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) at 8.47%. This indicates that PBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBF | MPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.64% | 8.47% | +12.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.06% | 26.02% | +22.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.86% | 32.65% | +33.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.15% | 33.04% | +27.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.63% | 39.98% | +27.65% |
Dividends
PBF vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison
PBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than MPC's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 1.24% | 2.29% | 2.43% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 3.63% | 5.61% | 3.52% | 3.12% | 2.30% | 2.70% | 2.20% |
PBF PBF Energy Inc. | 1.52% | 4.06% | 3.86% | 1.93% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 4.23% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 3.39% | 4.30% | 3.26% |
Financials
PBF vs. MPC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PBF Energy Inc. and Marathon Petroleum Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PBF vs. MPC - Profitability Comparison
PBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 11.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.8%.
MPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.31B and revenue of 34.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.
PBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 11.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
MPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported an operating income of 1.40B and revenue of 34.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
PBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a net income of 906.40M and revenue of 11.68B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
MPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a net income of 511.00M and revenue of 34.57B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PBF and MPC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBF has higher volatility (20.64%) compared to MPC (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBF dropped -91.51% vs MPC's -79.67%.
PBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBF and MPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer