PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEY vs. FVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEY vs. FVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEY has outperformed FVD with an annualized return of 12.04%, while FVD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.30% annualized return.


ONEY

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.52%
YTD
14.26%
6M
14.38%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
12.04%

FVD

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEY vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
14.26%7.74%11.63%11.12%-3.60%37.11%2.17%27.45%-8.71%15.46%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.21%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and FVD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015

0.78

The correlation between ONEY and FVD shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEY vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEY
FVD

Industrials

13.9%
14.2%

Energy

13.2%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

12.2%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
5.6%

Utilities

10.6%
18.4%

Financial Services

10.2%
19.1%

Real Estate

9.7%
8.1%

Basic Materials

8.2%
2.1%

Technology

4.8%
6.1%

Healthcare

3.8%
7.8%

Communication Services

1.6%
3.0%

Industrials

ONEY
13.9%
FVD
14.2%

Energy

ONEY
13.2%
FVD
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

ONEY
12.2%
FVD
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEY
11.8%
FVD
5.6%

Utilities

ONEY
10.6%
FVD
18.4%

Financial Services

ONEY
10.2%
FVD
19.1%

Real Estate

ONEY
9.7%
FVD
8.1%

Basic Materials

ONEY
8.2%
FVD
2.1%

Technology

ONEY
4.8%
FVD
6.1%

Healthcare

ONEY
3.8%
FVD
7.8%

Communication Services

ONEY
1.6%
FVD
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEY vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEY
ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEY vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEYFVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

0.95

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

2.58

+8.57

ONEY vs. FVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the FVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and FVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEYFVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

0.72

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.41

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.54

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.58

+0.04

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, smaller than the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and FVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEYFVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.80%

-51.00%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-7.23%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-11.97%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-16.41%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.80%

-35.25%

-11.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-5.96%

+5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-5.44%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.66%

-0.55%

Volatility

ONEY vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 2.62%. This indicates that ONEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEYFVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.62%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

6.73%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

9.50%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

12.76%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

15.44%

+4.43%

ONEY vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEY vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than FVD's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.31%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
2.81%3.15%3.18%3.14%3.17%2.46%2.74%3.17%3.72%10.73%6.31%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEY and FVD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEY has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs FVD's -51.00%.

On 10-year performance, ONEY leads with 12.04% vs 8.30% for FVD. On fees, ONEY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEY has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.31% for FVD.

ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.61% for FVD.

ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEY and FVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer