NVDB vs. NOBL

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

NVDB (ProShares Ultra NVDA) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NVIDIA Corporation, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. NVDB charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

NVDB vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra NVDA (NVDB) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDB achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 10.28% return.

NVDB

• 1D: 7.86%
• 1M: 3.62%
• 6M: 13.85%
• YTD: 11.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NOBL

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 3.21%
• 6M: 7.17%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 1Y: 13.02%
• 3Y*: 8.61%
• 5Y*: 6.59%
• 10Y*: 9.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDB vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA	11.22%	1.98%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	10.28%	1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDB and NOBL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

NVDB vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 33
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 31
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDB vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra NVDA (NVDB) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDB	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.04	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.18	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.32	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.35	—

Drawdowns

NVDB vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDB drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDB and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDB	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.89%	-35.43%	-7.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.47%	-1.59%	-21.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.82%	-3.47%	-16.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NVDB	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.49%	11.67%	+61.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.49%	14.42%	+59.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.49%	16.58%	+56.91%

NVDB vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDB vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

NVDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than NOBL's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.05%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA	1.45%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDB and NOBL in my portfolio?

NVDB and NOBL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NVDB or NOBL?

On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDB or NOBL?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NVDB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDB or NOBL?

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.45% for NVDB.

What is the main difference between NVDB and NOBL?

NVDB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. NVDB tracks NVIDIA Corporation, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NVDB and 0.35% for NOBL.