NVDB vs. QLD
NVDB (ProShares Ultra NVDA) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - NVDB tracks the NVIDIA Corporation while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
NVDB vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDB achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 18.94% return.
NVDB
- 1D
- 5.52%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- 6M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- YTD
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 42.18%
- 3Y*
- 35.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 32.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $471.67K | $569.36K | $937.39K | |
| $408.78M | $399.91M | $439.78M |
NVDB vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA | -1.03% | 1.98% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 18.94% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDB and QLD is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDB vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
NVDB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QLD
NVDB vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra NVDA (NVDB) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDB | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDB vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDB drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDB and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDB | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -83.13% | +40.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.90% | -16.72% | -15.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.44% | -18.11% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.47% | — |
Volatility
NVDB vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDB | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.23% | 38.62% | +35.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.23% | 45.76% | +28.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.23% | 44.97% | +29.26% |
NVDB vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NVDB and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
NVDB vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
NVDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than QLD's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDB and QLD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDB and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
NVDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.14% for QLD.
NVDB tracks NVIDIA Corporation, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
Find the right allocation for NVDB and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer