NVDB vs. UPRO
NVDB (ProShares Ultra NVDA) and UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - NVDB tracks the NVIDIA Corporation while UPRO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDB charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for UPRO.
Performance
NVDB vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDB achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 26.83% return.
NVDB
- 1D
- 7.86%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPRO
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- 6M
- 20.68%
- YTD
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 57.69%
- 3Y*
- 47.32%
- 5Y*
- 20.56%
- 10Y*
- 29.10%
NVDB vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA | 11.22% | 1.98% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 26.83% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDB and UPRO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDB vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank
NVDB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UPRO
NVDB vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra NVDA (NVDB) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDB | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDB vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDB drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDB and UPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDB | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -76.82% | +33.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.47% | -2.91% | -20.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -14.37% | -5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.76% | — |
Volatility
NVDB vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDB | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.49% | 37.50% | +35.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.49% | 50.65% | +22.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.49% | 53.70% | +19.79% |
NVDB vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDB vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison
NVDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than UPRO's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA | 1.45% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDB and UPRO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NVDB.
NVDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.74% for UPRO.
NVDB tracks NVIDIA Corporation, while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NVDB and 0.89% for UPRO.
Find the right allocation for NVDB and UPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer