NULC vs. FEDM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NULC (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF) and FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NULC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap, while FEDM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NULC returned 21.40%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for FEDM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NULC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FEDM.

Performance

NULC vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULC achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly higher than FEDM's 6.95% return.

NULC

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 5.15%
• YTD: 14.17%
• 6M: 14.22%
• 1Y: 26.89%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: —

FEDM

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 8.83%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULC vs. FEDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NULC Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF	14.17%	16.29%	18.71%	22.54%	-20.18%	6.65%
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	6.95%	26.85%	2.85%	17.39%	-15.25%	1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between NULC and FEDM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021	0.75

The correlation between NULC and FEDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

NULC vs. FEDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NULC	FEDM
Technology	36.2%	10.9%
Financial Services	13.4%	27.1%
Communication Services	10.9%	4.6%
Healthcare	8.7%	10.0%
Industrials	8.4%	17.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	7.1%
Energy	2.4%	5.7%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.8%
Utilities	2.0%	3.5%
Basic Materials	1.7%	5.9%

Return for Risk

NULC vs. FEDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULC

NULC Risk / Return Rank: 65
NULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
NULC Omega Ratio Rank: 62
NULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NULC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FEDM

FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 30
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULC vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NULC	FEDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.04	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	1.57	+1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.20	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.41	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.04	5.07	+7.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NULC vs. FEDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULC Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the FEDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULC and FEDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NULC	FEDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	1.04	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.47	+0.33

Drawdowns

NULC vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULC drawdown since its inception was -34.86%, which is greater than FEDM's maximum drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULC and FEDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NULC	FEDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.86%	-29.37%	-5.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-11.92%	+3.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.53%	-14.24%	-4.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-1.16%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-6.99%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	3.30%	-1.23%

Volatility

NULC vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) is 3.28%, while FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that NULC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NULC	FEDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	4.71%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.89%	12.47%	-2.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.78%	16.14%	-3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	16.46%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	16.46%	+3.22%

NULC vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NULC vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison

NULC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than FEDM's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	2.80%	2.97%	2.94%	2.61%	2.53%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%
NULC Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF	8.91%	10.17%	1.86%	1.32%	2.37%	6.14%	4.07%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NULC and FEDM in my portfolio?

NULC and FEDM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NULC or FEDM?

FEDM has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to NULC (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULC dropped -34.86% vs FEDM's -29.37%.

Which ETF is better, NULC or FEDM?

On 3-year performance, NULC leads with 21.40% vs 14.54% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, NULC has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NULC or FEDM?

Over the 3-year period, NULC has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NULC or FEDM?

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NULC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NULC or FEDM?

NULC has the higher dividend yield at 8.91%, compared with 2.80% for FEDM.

What is the main difference between NULC and FEDM?

NULC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FEDM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. NULC tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap, while FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NULC and 0.12% for FEDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NULC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.