FEDM vs. CHPS
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS).
FEDM and CHPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEDM is a passively managed fund by FlexShares that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. Both FEDM and CHPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FEDM or CHPS.
Correlation
The correlation between FEDM and CHPS is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FEDM vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FEDM:
0.54
CHPS:
-0.27
FEDM:
0.95
CHPS:
-0.14
FEDM:
1.13
CHPS:
0.98
FEDM:
0.69
CHPS:
-0.27
FEDM:
1.94
CHPS:
-0.58
FEDM:
5.08%
CHPS:
18.20%
FEDM:
16.83%
CHPS:
38.54%
FEDM:
-29.37%
CHPS:
-39.44%
FEDM:
-0.44%
CHPS:
-24.67%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than CHPS's -5.51% return.
FEDM
11.50%
8.80%
7.23%
8.96%
N/A
N/A
CHPS
-5.51%
7.43%
-11.63%
-10.29%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEDM vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FEDM vs. CHPS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FEDM
CHPS
FEDM vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FEDM vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than CHPS's 1.87% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.70% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 1.87% | 1.74% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FEDM vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and CHPS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FEDM vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) is 4.77%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that FEDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.