FEDM vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEDM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FEDM returned 15.78% vs 185.23% for CHPS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEDM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

FEDM vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 105.66% return.

FEDM

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: 5.68%
• 6M: 5.07%
• 1Y: 15.78%
• 3Y*: 14.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 12.97%
• YTD: 105.66%
• 6M: 105.80%
• 1Y: 185.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDM vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	5.68%	26.85%	2.85%	4.75%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	105.66%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and CHPS is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.58

The correlation between FEDM and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEDM vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEDM	CHPS
Financial Services	27.0%	0.2%
Industrials	17.3%	0.4%
Technology	11.9%	99.6%
Healthcare	9.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	0.0%
Basic Materials	6.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	0.0%
Energy	5.4%	0.6%
Communication Services	5.0%	0.0%
Utilities	3.3%	-
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

FEDM vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDM

FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 30
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDM vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEDM	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	4.70	-3.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	4.49	-3.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.63	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	10.66	-9.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.76	39.00	-34.24

FEDM vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDM and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEDM	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.37%	-39.44%	+10.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.92%	-17.50%	+5.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.33%	-9.68%	+7.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.93%	-9.08%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	4.77%	-1.45%

Volatility

FEDM vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) is 4.60%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 22.69%. This indicates that FEDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEDM	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	22.69%	-18.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.99%	34.28%	-21.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.49%	39.83%	-23.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.47%	35.51%	-19.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.47%	35.51%	-19.04%

FEDM vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FEDM vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	3.02%	2.97%	2.94%	2.61%	2.53%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEDM and CHPS in my portfolio?

FEDM and CHPS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEDM or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (22.69%) compared to FEDM (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, FEDM or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 185.23% vs 15.78% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FEDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEDM or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 185.23% return vs 15.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEDM or CHPS?

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CHPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEDM or CHPS?

FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.32% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between FEDM and CHPS?

FEDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.