FEDM vs. EVUS
FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) and EVUS (Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEDM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EVUS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Extended ESG Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FEDM returned 14.34%/yr vs 16.21%/yr for EVUS. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEDM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EVUS.
Performance
FEDM vs. EVUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than EVUS's 10.73% return.
FEDM
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 9.66%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVUS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEDM vs. EVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 7.01% | 26.85% | 2.85% | 7.12% |
EVUS Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF | 10.73% | 13.31% | 14.23% | 3.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEDM and EVUS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FEDM and EVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEDM vs. EVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEDM
EVUS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
FEDM
EVUS
Industrials
FEDM
EVUS
Technology
FEDM
EVUS
Healthcare
FEDM
EVUS
Consumer Defensive
FEDM
EVUS
Basic Materials
FEDM
EVUS
Energy
FEDM
EVUS
Consumer Cyclical
FEDM
EVUS
Communication Services
FEDM
EVUS
Utilities
FEDM
EVUS
Real Estate
FEDM
EVUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEDM vs. EVUS — Risk / Return Rank
FEDM
EVUS
FEDM vs. EVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEDM | EVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 2.28 | -1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 3.26 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 3.13 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 13.23 | -7.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEDM | EVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.28 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.99 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
FEDM vs. EVUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than EVUS's maximum drawdown of -15.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and EVUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEDM | EVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.37% | -15.65% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -7.72% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | -15.65% | +1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | 0.00% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -2.78% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 1.83% | +1.47% |
Volatility
FEDM vs. EVUS - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) at 2.48%. This indicates that FEDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEDM | EVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 2.48% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 7.94% | +4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 10.47% | +5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 12.72% | +3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 12.72% | +3.74% |
FEDM vs. EVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EVUS's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FEDM vs. EVUS - Dividend Comparison
FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than EVUS's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVUS Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.99% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.80% | 2.97% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEDM and EVUS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEDM has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to EVUS (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs EVUS's -15.65%.
On 3-year performance, EVUS leads with 16.21% vs 14.34% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, EVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EVUS has performed better with a 16.21% return vs 14.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EVUS.
FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.55% for EVUS.
FEDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EVUS is Large Cap Value Equities. FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EVUS tracks MSCI USA Value Extended ESG Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.18% for EVUS.
EVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEDM and EVUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer