PortfoliosLab logo
FEDM vs. DFSI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and DFSI is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FEDM vs. DFSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%55.00%60.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
49.76%
57.66%
FEDM
DFSI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FEDM:

0.54

DFSI:

0.82

Sortino Ratio

FEDM:

0.95

DFSI:

1.29

Omega Ratio

FEDM:

1.13

DFSI:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

FEDM:

0.69

DFSI:

1.13

Martin Ratio

FEDM:

1.94

DFSI:

3.37

Ulcer Index

FEDM:

5.08%

DFSI:

4.24%

Daily Std Dev

FEDM:

16.83%

DFSI:

16.64%

Max Drawdown

FEDM:

-29.37%

DFSI:

-12.82%

Current Drawdown

FEDM:

-0.44%

DFSI:

-0.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than DFSI's 13.77% return.


FEDM

YTD

11.50%

1M

8.80%

6M

7.23%

1Y

8.96%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DFSI

YTD

13.77%

1M

10.30%

6M

9.81%

1Y

13.48%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEDM vs. DFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSI's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FEDM vs. DFSI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEDM is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEDM is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEDM is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEDM is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEDM is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEDM is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFSI is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFSI is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFSI is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFSI is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFSI is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFSI is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FEDM vs. DFSI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FEDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the DFSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDM and DFSI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.54
0.82
FEDM
DFSI

Dividends

FEDM vs. DFSI - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than DFSI's 2.24% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.70%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.24%2.39%2.10%0.18%0.00%

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. DFSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than DFSI's maximum drawdown of -12.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and DFSI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.44%
-0.03%
FEDM
DFSI

Volatility

FEDM vs. DFSI - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) at 4.00%. This indicates that FEDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.77%
4.00%
FEDM
DFSI