FEDM vs. EASG
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG).
FEDM and EASG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEDM is a passively managed fund by FlexShares that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021. EASG is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2018. Both FEDM and EASG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FEDM or EASG.
Correlation
The correlation between FEDM and EASG is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FEDM vs. EASG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FEDM:
0.54
EASG:
0.33
FEDM:
0.95
EASG:
0.63
FEDM:
1.13
EASG:
1.08
FEDM:
0.69
EASG:
0.39
FEDM:
1.94
EASG:
1.04
FEDM:
5.08%
EASG:
6.00%
FEDM:
16.83%
EASG:
17.49%
FEDM:
-29.37%
EASG:
-32.06%
FEDM:
-0.44%
EASG:
-1.98%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than EASG's 10.00% return.
FEDM
11.50%
8.80%
7.23%
8.96%
N/A
N/A
EASG
10.00%
9.14%
6.45%
5.71%
10.32%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEDM vs. EASG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EASG's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FEDM vs. EASG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FEDM
EASG
FEDM vs. EASG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FEDM vs. EASG - Dividend Comparison
FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than EASG's 2.67% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.70% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 2.67% | 2.93% | 2.51% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.94% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
FEDM vs. EASG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, smaller than the maximum EASG drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and EASG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FEDM vs. EASG - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.