FEDM vs. EASG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) and EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FEDM tracks the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net while EASG tracks the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FEDM returned 14.74%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for EASG. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FEDM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for EASG.

Performance

FEDM vs. EASG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FEDM having a 11.05% return and EASG slightly higher at 11.08%.

FEDM

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 2.87%
• 6M: 6.92%
• YTD: 11.05%
• 1Y: 23.27%
• 3Y*: 14.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.15%

EASG

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 5.95%
• YTD: 11.08%
• 1Y: 23.37%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	$107.99K	$79.19K	$91.05K
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	$27.64K	$60.01K	$69.14K

FEDM vs. EASG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	11.05%	26.85%	2.85%	17.39%	-15.25%	1.50%
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	11.08%	25.19%	2.26%	18.80%	-16.94%	1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and EASG is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021	0.95

The correlation between FEDM and EASG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEDM vs. EASG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEDM	EASG
Financial Services	28.7%	24.7%
Industrials	16.9%	17.5%
Technology	11.1%	14.8%
Healthcare	9.1%	11.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	6.4%
Basic Materials	6.4%	5.7%
Energy	5.6%	2.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	6.7%
Communication Services	3.3%	5.2%
Utilities	3.2%	3.7%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

FEDM vs. EASG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEDM

FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 58
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 59

EASG

EASG Risk / Return Rank: 59
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEDM vs. EASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEDM	EASG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.43	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.04	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.97	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	7.39	-0.39

FEDM vs. EASG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the EASG Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDM and EASG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. EASG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, smaller than the maximum EASG drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and EASG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEDM	EASG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.37%	-32.06%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.92%	-11.74%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.24%	-16.14%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-0.79%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.80%	-6.09%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	3.12%	+0.14%

Volatility

FEDM vs. EASG - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) have volatilities of 4.25% and 4.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEDM	EASG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	4.39%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.24%	13.55%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.55%	16.16%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.42%	16.78%	-0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.42%	18.32%	-1.90%

FEDM vs. EASG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EASG's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FEDM vs. EASG - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than EASG's 3.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	3.83%	4.18%	2.93%	2.51%	2.47%	2.69%	1.70%	2.94%	0.85%
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	2.87%	2.97%	2.94%	2.61%	2.53%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEDM and EASG in my portfolio?

FEDM and EASG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEDM or EASG?

EASG has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to FEDM (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs EASG's -32.06%.

Which ETF is better, FEDM or EASG?

On 3-year performance, FEDM leads with 14.74% vs 13.72% for EASG. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FEDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEDM or EASG?

Over the 3-year period, FEDM has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 13.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEDM or EASG?

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for EASG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEDM or EASG?

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 2.87% for FEDM.

What is the main difference between FEDM and EASG?

FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.14% for EASG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EASG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.