NULC vs. USSG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NULC (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF) and USSG (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - NULC tracks the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap while USSG tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NULC returned 10.62%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for USSG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NULC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for USSG.

Performance

NULC vs. USSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULC achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than USSG's 7.41% return.

NULC

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 11.42%
• 6M: 10.52%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 19.66%
• 5Y*: 10.62%
• 10Y*: —

USSG

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -1.40%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 6.03%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: 21.01%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULC vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NULC Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF	11.42%	16.29%	18.71%	22.54%	-20.18%	25.69%	22.51%	6.17%
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF	7.41%	18.97%	23.45%	29.17%	-20.33%	31.83%	18.71%	18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between NULC and USSG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019	0.96

The correlation between NULC and USSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NULC vs. USSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NULC	USSG
Technology	30.1%	35.0%
Financial Services	17.1%	10.5%
Healthcare	10.6%	10.0%
Industrials	9.5%	8.1%
Communication Services	9.2%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	5.4%
Energy	3.4%	2.1%
Utilities	2.2%	1.7%
Real Estate	2.2%	2.1%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.0%

Return for Risk

NULC vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULC

NULC Risk / Return Rank: 61
NULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NULC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
NULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
NULC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

USSG

USSG Risk / Return Rank: 54
USSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
USSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
USSG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
USSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
USSG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULC vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NULC	USSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.79	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.50	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	2.19	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.61	9.23	+2.38

NULC vs. USSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULC Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the USSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULC and USSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NULC vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULC drawdown since its inception was -34.86%, roughly equal to the maximum USSG drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULC and USSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NULC	USSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.86%	-34.10%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-11.20%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.53%	-20.00%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.90%	-27.00%	-0.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.91%	-3.10%	+0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-5.57%	-0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.65%	-0.51%

Volatility

NULC vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) is 5.02%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that NULC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NULC	USSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	5.30%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.57%	10.95%	-0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.34%	13.73%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	17.70%	-0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.98%	20.17%	-0.19%

NULC vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NULC vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison

NULC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, more than USSG's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NULC Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF	9.13%	10.17%	1.86%	1.32%	2.37%	6.14%	4.07%	0.77%
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF	1.01%	1.02%	1.13%	1.60%	1.52%	1.13%	1.42%	1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NULC and USSG in my portfolio?

NULC and USSG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NULC or USSG?

USSG has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to NULC (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULC dropped -34.86% vs USSG's -34.10%.

Which ETF is better, NULC or USSG?

On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 13.10% vs 10.62% for NULC. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, NULC has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NULC or USSG?

Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 13.10% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NULC or USSG?

USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NULC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NULC or USSG?

NULC has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 1.01% for USSG.

What is the main difference between NULC and USSG?

NULC tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap, while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NULC and 0.10% for USSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NULC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.