FEDM vs. GSEU
FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) and GSEU (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEDM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GSEU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FEDM returned 14.34%/yr vs 16.90%/yr for GSEU. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEDM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSEU.
Performance
FEDM vs. GSEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEDM having a 7.01% return and GSEU slightly lower at 6.68%.
FEDM
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 9.66%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSEU
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
FEDM vs. GSEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 7.01% | 26.85% | 2.85% | 17.39% | -15.25% | 1.87% |
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 6.68% | 35.70% | 2.00% | 20.74% | -17.90% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEDM and GSEU is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FEDM and GSEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEDM vs. GSEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEDM
GSEU
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
FEDM
GSEU
Industrials
FEDM
GSEU
Technology
FEDM
GSEU
Healthcare
FEDM
GSEU
Consumer Defensive
FEDM
GSEU
Basic Materials
FEDM
GSEU
Energy
FEDM
GSEU
Consumer Cyclical
FEDM
GSEU
Communication Services
FEDM
GSEU
Utilities
FEDM
GSEU
Real Estate
FEDM
GSEU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEDM vs. GSEU — Risk / Return Rank
FEDM
GSEU
FEDM vs. GSEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEDM | GSEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.16 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.68 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.55 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 5.83 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEDM | GSEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.16 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FEDM vs. GSEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, smaller than the maximum GSEU drawdown of -35.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and GSEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEDM | GSEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.37% | -35.71% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -11.90% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | -14.12% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -1.17% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -6.60% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.16% | +0.14% |
Volatility
FEDM vs. GSEU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) is 4.84%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that FEDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEDM | GSEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 5.86% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 12.44% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 15.11% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 17.14% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 18.11% | -1.65% |
FEDM vs. GSEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GSEU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FEDM vs. GSEU - Dividend Comparison
FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than GSEU's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.80% | 2.97% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 2.55% | 2.72% | 2.35% | 3.41% | 3.34% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 3.69% | 3.40% | 2.51% | 2.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEDM and GSEU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSEU has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to FEDM (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs GSEU's -35.71%.
On 3-year performance, GSEU leads with 16.90% vs 14.34% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FEDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GSEU has performed better with a 16.90% return vs 14.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSEU.
FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 2.55% for GSEU.
FEDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GSEU is Europe Equities. FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.25% for GSEU.
GSEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEDM and GSEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer