PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDM vs. GSEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDM vs. GSEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEDM having a 12.23% return and GSEU slightly lower at 11.86%.


FEDM

1D
0.84%
1M
3.96%
6M
7.26%
YTD
12.23%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.37%

GSEU

1D
0.64%
1M
2.32%
6M
6.92%
YTD
11.86%
1Y
23.83%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$56.44K$68.81K$71.09K
$243.70K$273.74K$305.32K

FEDM vs. GSEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
12.23%26.85%2.85%17.39%-15.25%1.50%
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
11.86%35.70%2.00%20.74%-17.90%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and GSEU is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021

0.94

The correlation between FEDM and GSEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEDM vs. GSEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEDM
GSEU

Financial Services

28.7%
24.7%

Industrials

16.9%
19.9%

Technology

11.1%
9.4%

Healthcare

9.1%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
8.4%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.6%

Energy

5.6%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
6.7%

Communication Services

3.3%
3.7%

Utilities

3.2%
4.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.5%

Financial Services

FEDM
28.7%
GSEU
24.7%

Industrials

FEDM
16.9%
GSEU
19.9%

Technology

FEDM
11.1%
GSEU
9.4%

Healthcare

FEDM
9.1%
GSEU
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

FEDM
6.5%
GSEU
8.4%

Basic Materials

FEDM
6.4%
GSEU
4.6%

Energy

FEDM
5.6%
GSEU
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FEDM
5.4%
GSEU
6.7%

Communication Services

FEDM
3.3%
GSEU
3.7%

Utilities

FEDM
3.2%
GSEU
4.6%

Real Estate

FEDM
1.7%
GSEU
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDM vs. GSEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEU
GSEU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GSEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEU Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEDM vs. GSEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDMGSEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.01

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

7.75

-0.55

FEDM vs. GSEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the GSEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDM and GSEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. GSEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, smaller than the maximum GSEU drawdown of -35.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and GSEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDMGSEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-35.71%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-11.90%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-14.12%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-6.51%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.08%

+0.18%

Volatility

FEDM vs. GSEU - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) have volatilities of 4.05% and 3.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDMGSEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.96%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

13.24%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

15.40%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.41%

17.22%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

17.69%

-1.28%

FEDM vs. GSEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GSEU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEDM vs. GSEU - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than GSEU's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.84%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
2.69%2.72%2.35%3.41%3.34%2.71%1.84%3.69%3.40%2.51%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDM and GSEU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEDM has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to GSEU (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs GSEU's -35.71%.

On 3-year performance, GSEU leads with 17.84% vs 15.90% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GSEU has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 15.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSEU.

FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.69% for GSEU.

FEDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GSEU is Europe Equities. FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.25% for GSEU.

GSEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDM and GSEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer