PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NULC vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NULC and BDGS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

NULC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.89%
15.12%
NULC
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NULC:

1.80

BDGS:

4.63

Sortino Ratio

NULC:

2.51

BDGS:

9.08

Omega Ratio

NULC:

1.32

BDGS:

2.71

Calmar Ratio

NULC:

2.54

BDGS:

8.67

Martin Ratio

NULC:

10.03

BDGS:

50.51

Ulcer Index

NULC:

2.22%

BDGS:

0.41%

Daily Std Dev

NULC:

12.41%

BDGS:

4.48%

Max Drawdown

NULC:

-34.86%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

NULC:

-3.61%

BDGS:

-0.05%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NULC having a 21.39% return and BDGS slightly lower at 20.51%.


NULC

YTD

21.39%

1M

-2.35%

6M

7.88%

1Y

21.89%

5Y*

12.86%

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

20.51%

1M

2.27%

6M

15.11%

1Y

20.58%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NULC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for NULC: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NULC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NULC, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.804.63
The chart of Sortino ratio for NULC, currently valued at 2.51, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.519.08
The chart of Omega ratio for NULC, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.322.71
The chart of Calmar ratio for NULC, currently valued at 2.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.548.67
The chart of Martin ratio for NULC, currently valued at 10.03, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.0350.51
NULC
BDGS

The current NULC Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULC and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.80
4.63
NULC
BDGS

Dividends

NULC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

NULC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while BDGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
2.65%1.32%2.37%6.14%4.07%0.78%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.00%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NULC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULC drawdown since its inception was -34.86%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULC and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.61%
-0.05%
NULC
BDGS

Volatility

NULC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.61%. This indicates that NULC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.33%
1.61%
NULC
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab