PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NU vs. PYPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NU vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NU having a -27.18% return and PYPL slightly lower at -28.41%.


NU

1D
0.83%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-27.18%
6M
-27.87%
1Y
1.58%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10Y*

PYPL

1D
0.70%
1M
-7.88%
YTD
-28.41%
6M
-32.22%
1Y
-44.01%
3Y*
-12.98%
5Y*
-31.18%
10Y*
1.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NU vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-27.18%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-16.62%
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
-28.41%-31.44%38.98%-13.77%-62.23%-4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NU and PYPL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.42

The correlation between NU and PYPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NU:

$59.86B

PYPL:

$38.21B

EPS

NU:

$0.65

PYPL:

$5.31

PE Ratio

NU:

18.78

PYPL:

7.83

PEG Ratio

NU:

0.29

PYPL:

0.38

PS Ratio

NU:

3.41

PYPL:

1.17

PB Ratio

NU:

4.75

PYPL:

1.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

NU:

$17.54B

PYPL:

$33.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NU:

$7.67B

PYPL:

$15.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

NU:

$4.14B

PYPL:

$7.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NU vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PYPL
PYPL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PYPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NU vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUPYPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.79

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

-0.88

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

-1.54

+1.64

NU vs. PYPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NU Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the PYPL Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NU and PYPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NU vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, smaller than the maximum PYPL drawdown of -87.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and PYPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUPYPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.07%

-87.30%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-49.92%

+11.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.58%

-57.34%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.02%

-86.42%

+51.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.77%

-35.90%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.36%

28.60%

-13.24%

Volatility

NU vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a higher volatility of 14.80% compared to PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) at 7.01%. This indicates that NU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUPYPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.80%

7.01%

+7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.91%

31.72%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.77%

39.10%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.48%

42.08%

+16.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.48%

38.77%

+19.71%

Dividends

NU vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison

NU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM2025
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
1.01%0.24%

Financials

NU vs. PYPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Holdings Ltd. and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
4.98B
8.35B
(NU) Total Revenue
(PYPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NU vs. PYPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nu Holdings Ltd. and PayPal Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
40.2%
45.6%
Portfolio components
NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

PYPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

PYPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.

PYPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.11B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NU and PYPL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NU has higher volatility (14.80%) compared to PYPL (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NU dropped -72.07% vs PYPL's -87.30%.

NU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NU and PYPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer