PYPL vs. META
PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. PYPL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, PYPL returned 4.68%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for META. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
PYPL vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPL achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly higher than META's -15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PYPL has underperformed META with an annualized return of 4.68%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.
PYPL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- -14.01%
- 3Y*
- -8.58%
- 5Y*
- -26.85%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.04%
META
- 1D
- 3.28%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- 6M
- -22.16%
- YTD
- -15.51%
- 1Y
- -25.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.87B | $11.79B | $10.93B | |
| $886.89M | $1.02B | $835.02M |
PYPL vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -1.38% | -31.44% | 38.98% | -13.77% | -62.23% | -19.48% | 116.51% | 28.64% | 14.22% | 86.52% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -15.51% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPL and META is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2015 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PYPL and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PYPL:
$50.47B
META:
$1.42T
PYPL:
$5.25
META:
$26.51
PYPL:
10.91
META:
21.00
PYPL:
0.53
META:
0.86
PYPL:
1.57
META:
6.27
PYPL:
2.60
META:
5.47
PYPL:
$34.13B
META:
$228.25B
PYPL:
$15.62B
META:
$186.59B
PYPL:
$7.49B
META:
$107.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPL vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
PYPL
META
PYPL vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYPL | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.89 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | -0.84 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | -1.52 | +0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYPL vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPL drawdown since its inception was -87.30%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPL and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPL | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.30% | -76.74% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.55% | -33.30% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.34% | -34.15% | -23.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.64% | -76.74% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.30% | -76.74% | -10.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.30% | -29.30% | -52.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.47% | -15.90% | -20.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.74% | 18.25% | +11.49% |
Volatility
PYPL vs. META - Volatility Comparison
PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) has a higher volatility of 17.17% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 15.37%. This indicates that PYPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPL | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.17% | 15.37% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.49% | 30.29% | +6.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.87% | 39.78% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.88% | 44.68% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.15% | 39.10% | +0.05% |
Dividends
PYPL vs. META - Dividend Comparison
PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than META's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.73% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
Financials
PYPL vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PYPL vs. META - Profitability Comparison
PYPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.90B and revenue of 8.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.9%.
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.47B and revenue of 60.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.
PYPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.89B and revenue of 8.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.78B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.
PYPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.10B and revenue of 8.68B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 15.85B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPL and META have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPL has higher volatility (17.17%) compared to META (15.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPL dropped -87.30% vs META's -76.74%.
PYPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPL and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer