PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYPL vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

PYPL vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PYPL vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
-22.29%-31.44%38.98%-13.77%-62.23%-19.48%116.51%28.64%14.22%86.52%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-13.25%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PYPL:

$42.47B

META:

$1.47T

EPS

PYPL:

$5.42

META:

$23.51

PE Ratio

PYPL:

8.34

META:

24.34

PEG Ratio

PYPL:

0.40

META:

1.00

PS Ratio

PYPL:

1.32

META:

7.32

PB Ratio

PYPL:

2.10

META:

6.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

PYPL:

$33.17B

META:

$200.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PYPL:

$15.47B

META:

$164.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

PYPL:

$7.18B

META:

$104.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYPL achieves a -22.29% return, which is significantly lower than META's -13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PYPL has underperformed META with an annualized return of 1.44%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.


PYPL

1D
1.25%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
-22.29%
6M
-32.19%
1Y
-30.31%
3Y*
-15.71%
5Y*
-28.74%
10Y*
1.44%

META

1D
6.67%
1M
-11.66%
YTD
-13.25%
6M
-21.96%
1Y
-0.42%
3Y*
39.60%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYPL vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYPL
PYPL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PYPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPL Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPL Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYPL vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYPLMETADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.74

-0.01

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.82

0.29

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.04

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

-0.01

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.37

-0.04

-1.34

PYPL vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYPL Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYPL and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYPLMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

-0.01

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.69

0.32

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.45

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.55

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between PYPL and META is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PYPL vs. META - Dividend Comparison

PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than META's 0.37% yield.


TTM20252024
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.62%0.24%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.37%0.32%0.34%

Drawdowns

PYPL vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYPL drawdown since its inception was -87.30%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPL and META.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PYPLMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.30%

-76.74%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.92%

-33.30%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.30%

-76.74%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.30%

-76.74%

-10.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.26%

-27.41%

-57.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-15.19%

-19.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.00%

13.13%

+8.87%

Volatility

PYPL vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is 9.59%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 13.64%. This indicates that PYPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PYPLMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

13.64%

-4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.56%

26.73%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.33%

39.91%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.00%

43.77%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.63%

38.46%

+0.17%

Financials

PYPL vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
8.68B
59.89B
(PYPL) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PYPL vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
46.5%
81.8%
Portfolio components
PYPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.03B and revenue of 8.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.99B and revenue of 59.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

PYPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.51B and revenue of 8.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.75B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

PYPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 8.68B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 22.77B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.0%.