NOW vs. ATMP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NOW (ServiceNow, Inc) is a stock, while ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Over the past 10 years, NOW returned 21.48%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for ATMP. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NOW vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOW achieves a -33.32% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 20.60% return. Over the past 10 years, NOW has outperformed ATMP with an annualized return of 21.48%, while ATMP has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return.

NOW

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 12.87%
• YTD: -33.32%
• 6M: -40.96%
• 1Y: -48.34%
• 3Y*: -2.72%
• 5Y*: 0.51%
• 10Y*: 21.48%

ATMP

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -3.30%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 20.43%
• 1Y: 18.09%
• 3Y*: 21.55%
• 5Y*: 15.05%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOW vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOW ServiceNow, Inc	-33.32%	-27.75%	50.05%	81.96%	-40.18%	17.93%	94.97%	58.56%	36.55%	75.40%
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	20.60%	1.73%	31.66%	14.51%	20.71%	33.06%	-34.39%	0.39%	-14.55%	-11.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NOW and ATMP is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2013	0.23

The correlation between NOW and ATMP shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NOW vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOW

NOW Risk / Return Rank: 8
NOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
NOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 44
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOW vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOW	ATMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	1.31	-2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	1.87	-3.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.23	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	2.53	-3.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	5.89	-7.34

NOW vs. ATMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOW Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the ATMP Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOW and ATMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOW vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOW drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOW and ATMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOW	ATMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.54%	-80.86%	+16.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.28%	-7.30%	-52.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.54%	-16.48%	-48.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.54%	-22.98%	-41.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.54%	-75.66%	+11.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.36%	-5.61%	-50.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.78%	-31.08%	+17.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.02%	3.13%	+30.89%

Volatility

NOW vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison

ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) has a higher volatility of 25.56% compared to Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) at 5.64%. This indicates that NOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOW	ATMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.56%	5.64%	+19.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.01%	10.99%	+36.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.12%	14.18%	+35.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.44%	22.25%	+21.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.86%	27.67%	+13.19%

Dividends

NOW vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NOW nor ATMP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOW and ATMP in my portfolio?

NOW and ATMP have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOW or ATMP?

NOW has higher volatility (25.56%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOW dropped -64.54% vs ATMP's -80.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.