NOBL vs. UVXY
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and UVXY (ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while UVXY is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NOBL returned 9.85%/yr vs -71.03%/yr for UVXY. Their -0.63 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UVXY.
Performance
NOBL vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than UVXY's -36.18% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has outperformed UVXY with an annualized return of 9.85%, while UVXY has yielded a comparatively lower -71.03% annualized return.
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.74%
UVXY
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- 6M
- -33.79%
- YTD
- -36.18%
- 1Y
- -73.63%
- 3Y*
- -63.76%
- 5Y*
- -68.11%
- 10Y*
- -71.03%
- ALL TIME*
- -80.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $70.34M | $67.56M | $62.19M | |
| $186.30M | $190.88M | $236.21M |
NOBL vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 11.50% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
UVXY ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | -36.18% | -65.32% | -50.90% | -87.70% | -44.81% | -88.33% | -17.38% | -84.23% | 60.10% | -94.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and UVXY is -0.34, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | -0.63 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between NOBL and UVXY has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.63 to -0.34, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOBL vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank
NOBL
UVXY
NOBL vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOBL | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.82 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | -1.03 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | -1.54 | +6.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and UVXY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBL | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -100.00% | +64.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -71.36% | +62.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -95.42% | +80.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | -99.68% | +81.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | -100.00% | +64.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -100.00% | +98.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -98.76% | +95.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 51.81% | -48.22% |
Volatility
NOBL vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 4.72%, while ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) has a volatility of 22.30%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOBL | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 22.30% | -17.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 65.53% | -56.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.92% | 86.48% | -74.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 103.34% | -88.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 112.09% | -95.45% |
NOBL vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOBL vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while UVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.03% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
UVXY ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOBL and UVXY have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UVXY has higher volatility (22.30%) compared to NOBL (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs UVXY's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.85% vs -71.03% for UVXY. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.85% return vs -71.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for UVXY.
NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while UVXY is Volatility. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.95% for UVXY.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOBL and UVXY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer