PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NOBL vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NOBL vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NOBL returned 9.51%/yr vs 14.43%/yr for UGA. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

NOBL vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 9.51%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.

NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%

UGA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-12.35%
YTD
75.49%
6M
64.35%
1Y
80.94%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
25.10%
10Y*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP		75.49%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and UGA is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013

0.17

The correlation between NOBL and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

United States Gasoline Fund LP

Often compared with NOBL:
NOBL vs. SCHDNOBL vs. SPYNOBL vs. VIGNOBL vs. DGRONOBL vs. SDYNOBL vs. VOONOBL vs. KNG
Often compared with UGA:
UGA vs. URAUGA vs. FCGUGA vs. QQQUGA vs. VOOUGA vs. USOUGA vs. SPYUGA vs. FNGS

Return for Risk

NOBL vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NOBLUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.80
2.32

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.24
2.75

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

5.47

-4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

13.25

-10.67

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOBL vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NOBLUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

2.32

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.73

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.39

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.12

+0.52

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and UGA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NOBLUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-86.59%

+51.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-14.88%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-26.68%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-38.11%

+20.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-75.89%

+40.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.99%

-12.35%

+6.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-36.76%

+33.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

6.13%

-2.63%

Volatility

NOBL vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 2.36%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NOBLUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

11.66%

-9.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

30.41%

-22.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

35.14%

-23.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

34.38%

-20.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

37.27%

-20.67%

NOBL vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOBL vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

NOBL and UGA have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.43% vs 9.51% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while UGA is Oil & Gas. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer