UGA vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
UGA and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UGA is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. It was launched on Feb 26, 2008. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. Both UGA and URA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UGA or URA.
Key characteristics
| UGA | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.81% | 12.46% |
| 1Y Return | 14.61% | 62.37% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 24.49% | 18.47% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.88% | 25.79% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 0.76% | 3.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.58 | 1.93 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.39% | 32.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -86.59% | -93.54% |
| Current Drawdown | -18.26% | -67.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGA and URA is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UGA vs. URA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UGA achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 12.46% return. Over the past 10 years, UGA has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 0.76%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 3.91% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UGA vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UGA vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UGA vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 5.40% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% | 0.54% |
Drawdowns
UGA vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGA drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGA and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UGA vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) is 6.65%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that UGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.