UGA vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
UGA and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UGA is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. It was launched on Feb 26, 2008. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. Both UGA and FNGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UGA or FNGS.
Key characteristics
| UGA | FNGS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.81% | 18.07% |
| 1Y Return | 14.61% | 59.71% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 24.49% | 17.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.58 | 2.59 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.39% | 23.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -86.59% | -48.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -18.26% | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGA and FNGS is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UGA vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UGA achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 18.07% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UGA vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UGA vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UGA vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither UGA nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UGA vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGA drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGA and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UGA vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) is 6.65%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that UGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.