UGA vs. FNGS
UGA (United States Gasoline Fund, LP) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UGA returned 25.31%/yr vs 19.42%/yr for FNGS. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UGA charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.
Performance
UGA vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGA achieves a 80.98% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 12.53% return.
UGA
- 1D
- -5.27%
- 1M
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 69.92%
- YTD
- 80.98%
- 1Y
- 78.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 25.31%
- 10Y*
- 16.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.51%
FNGS
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 16.07%
- YTD
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 19.17%
- 3Y*
- 31.24%
- 5Y*
- 19.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.70M | $1.91M | $2.41M | |
| $8.16M | $5.91M | $4.98M |
UGA vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP | 80.98% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 5.17% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 12.53% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGA and FNGS is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019 | 0.10 |
The correlation between UGA and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGA vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
UGA
FNGS
UGA vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UGA | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.16 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 0.84 | +3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | 2.23 | +8.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UGA vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGA drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGA and FNGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGA | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -48.98% | -37.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.32% | -22.93% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.68% | -26.77% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -48.98% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.61% | -4.76% | -5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.53% | -10.80% | -25.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.25% | 8.61% | -1.36% |
Volatility
UGA vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 6.65%. This indicates that UGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGA | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 6.65% | +6.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.51% | 18.60% | +13.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.42% | 22.88% | +13.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.68% | 30.33% | +4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.30% | 31.09% | +6.21% |
UGA vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGA has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGA vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither UGA nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UGA and FNGS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to FNGS (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGA dropped -86.59% vs FNGS's -48.98%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 25.31% vs 19.42% for FNGS. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 25.31% return vs 19.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.
UGA and FNGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
UGA is categorized as Oil & Gas, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. UGA tracks Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for UGA and 0.58% for FNGS.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGA and FNGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer