UGA vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
UGA and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UGA is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. It was launched on Feb 26, 2008. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. Both UGA and FNGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UGA vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UGA vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 61.19% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 3.49% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | -10.61% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGA achieves a 61.19% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's -10.61% return.
UGA
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- 31.39%
- YTD
- 61.19%
- 6M
- 57.41%
- 1Y
- 54.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 25.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.86%
FNGS
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- -10.61%
- 6M
- -12.74%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 31.31%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UGA vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UGA vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
UGA
FNGS
UGA vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UGA | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.68 | 0.77 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 1.32 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.17 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 0.96 | +2.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.76 | 2.94 | +4.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UGA | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 0.77 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.54 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.91 | -0.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between UGA and FNGS is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UGA vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither UGA nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UGA vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGA drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGA and FNGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGA | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -48.98% | -37.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.53% | -22.93% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -48.98% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.00% | -17.66% | +11.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -11.02% | -26.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.07% | 7.52% | -0.45% |
Volatility
UGA vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a higher volatility of 18.86% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.61%. This indicates that UGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UGA | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.86% | 8.61% | +10.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.78% | 15.82% | +9.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.35% | 27.04% | +5.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 29.98% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.00% | 31.34% | +5.66% |