NOBL vs. SMDV

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV).

NOBL and SMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. SMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. Both NOBL and SMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NOBL vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NOBL vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.28%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	25.46%	8.35%	27.39%	-3.26%	21.02%
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF	5.65%	0.26%	7.03%	8.99%	-5.90%	18.98%	-4.74%	17.23%	-0.58%	4.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than SMDV's 5.65% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has outperformed SMDV with an annualized return of 9.59%, while SMDV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.32% annualized return.

NOBL

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -5.88%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 5.84%
• 3Y*: 7.28%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 9.59%

SMDV

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -2.85%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 6M: 6.12%
• 1Y: 7.66%
• 3Y*: 7.46%
• 5Y*: 3.79%
• 10Y*: 7.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.

SMDV

ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Return for Risk

NOBL vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 21
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 22

SMDV

SMDV Risk / Return Rank: 23
SMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
SMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
SMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOBL	SMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	0.42	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	0.75	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.09	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	0.77	-0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.91	2.23	-0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOBL vs. SMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is comparable to the SMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and SMDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOBL	SMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	0.42	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.20	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.35	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.37	+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and SMDV is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NOBL vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than SMDV's 2.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.14%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF	2.49%	2.67%	2.68%	2.69%	2.51%	2.02%	2.13%	2.03%	1.97%	1.84%	1.35%	1.81%

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, roughly equal to the maximum SMDV drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and SMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOBL	SMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-34.12%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-9.79%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.92%	-21.23%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.43%	-34.12%	-1.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.11%	-5.58%	-1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	-5.99%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	3.77%	-0.56%

Volatility

NOBL vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 3.55%, while ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOBL	SMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	4.33%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.06%	10.67%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.24%	18.25%	-3.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.39%	18.71%	-4.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	20.71%	-4.12%