SMDV vs. TDV
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV).
SMDV and TDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. TDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. Both SMDV and TDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMDV or TDV.
Correlation
The correlation between SMDV and TDV is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SMDV vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SMDV:
0.77
TDV:
0.97
SMDV:
1.24
TDV:
1.38
SMDV:
1.15
TDV:
1.17
SMDV:
1.10
TDV:
1.36
SMDV:
3.32
TDV:
4.60
SMDV:
4.71%
TDV:
3.58%
SMDV:
20.35%
TDV:
16.90%
SMDV:
-34.12%
TDV:
-32.78%
SMDV:
-8.08%
TDV:
-0.85%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMDV achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than TDV's 3.82% return.
SMDV
2.26%
1.29%
0.68%
12.14%
4.78%
N/A
TDV
3.82%
3.32%
2.87%
13.16%
14.32%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMDV vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMDV vs. TDV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SMDV
TDV
SMDV vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMDV vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than TDV's 1.11% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.03% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.08% | 1.47% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.11% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMDV vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDV drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, roughly equal to the maximum TDV drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDV and TDV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMDV vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 4.88%. This indicates that SMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.