SMDV vs. SPY
SMDV (ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMDV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMDV returned 7.45%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMDV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
SMDV vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMDV achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SMDV has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 7.45%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
SMDV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 13.61%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 7.45%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
SMDV vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 13.61% | 0.26% | 7.03% | 8.99% | -5.90% | 18.98% | -4.74% | 17.23% | -0.58% | 4.63% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMDV and SPY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SMDV and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMDV vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMDV
SPY
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
-
Financial Services
SMDV
SPY
Industrials
SMDV
SPY
Utilities
SMDV
SPY
Basic Materials
SMDV
SPY
Real Estate
SMDV
SPY
Consumer Defensive
SMDV
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
SMDV
SPY
Technology
SMDV
SPY
Healthcare
SMDV
SPY
Communication Services
SMDV
SPY
Energy
SMDV
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMDV vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
SMDV
SPY
SMDV vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMDV | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 3.01 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 13.54 | -7.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMDV vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDV drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDV and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMDV | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.12% | -55.19% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -8.88% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.23% | -18.76% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -24.50% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.12% | -33.72% | -0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -1.75% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.91% | -9.04% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 1.97% | +1.25% |
Volatility
SMDV vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) is 3.98%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that SMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMDV | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 4.64% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 9.75% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 12.43% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 17.14% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 17.99% | +2.75% |
SMDV vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMDV vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.32% | 2.67% | 2.68% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.35% | 1.81% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMDV and SPY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to SMDV (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDV dropped -34.12% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 7.45% for SMDV. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SMDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SMDV.
SMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
SMDV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. SMDV tracks Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SMDV and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMDV and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer