PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. IDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 6.85% return, which is significantly lower than IDV's 13.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed IDV with an annualized return of 9.89%, while IDV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.


NOBL

1D
0.75%
1M
3.77%
YTD
6.85%
6M
6.04%
1Y
12.41%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
9.89%

IDV

1D
2.21%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
13.24%
6M
14.83%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
6.85%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
13.24%52.16%4.00%10.32%-6.40%12.00%-5.94%23.56%-10.37%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and IDV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.68

The correlation between NOBL and IDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NOBL vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOBL
IDV

Consumer Defensive

23.5%
7.2%

Industrials

20.3%
6.7%

Financial Services

12.4%
30.1%

Basic Materials

10.9%
5.8%

Healthcare

9.7%

-

Utilities

6.4%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
9.6%

Real Estate

4.6%
2.4%

Technology

3.6%
0.9%

Energy

3.4%
15.6%

Communication Services

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

NOBL
23.5%
IDV
7.2%

Industrials

NOBL
20.3%
IDV
6.7%

Financial Services

NOBL
12.4%
IDV
30.1%

Basic Materials

NOBL
10.9%
IDV
5.8%

Healthcare

NOBL
9.7%
IDV

-

Utilities

NOBL
6.4%
IDV
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NOBL
5.1%
IDV
9.6%

Real Estate

NOBL
4.6%
IDV
2.4%

Technology

NOBL
3.6%
IDV
0.9%

Energy

NOBL
3.4%
IDV
15.6%

Communication Services

NOBL

-

IDV
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBLIDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.50

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

4.24

-2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

15.72

-12.21

NOBL vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the IDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and IDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and IDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-70.14%

+34.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-8.52%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-11.86%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-29.19%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-42.50%

+7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-2.01%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-15.38%

+11.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

2.29%

+1.26%

Volatility

NOBL vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 3.02%, while iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

4.24%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

10.91%

-2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

13.10%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

15.59%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

17.93%

-1.31%

NOBL vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than IDV's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
4.41%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.05%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBL and IDV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDV has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to NOBL (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs IDV's -70.14%.

On 10-year performance, IDV leads with 10.72% vs 9.89% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDV has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 2.05% for NOBL.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while IDV is Global Equities. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.49% for IDV.

IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and IDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer