IDV vs. LVHI
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDV returned 12.32%/yr vs 15.85%/yr for LVHI. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
IDV vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 12.28% return.
IDV
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 11.49%
- 1Y
- 32.74%
- 3Y*
- 23.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 31.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 15.85%
- 10Y*
- —
IDV vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 10.05% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 12.28% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and LVHI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IDV and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDV vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
LVHI
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
IDV
LVHI
Energy
IDV
LVHI
Utilities
IDV
LVHI
Communication Services
IDV
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
IDV
LVHI
Industrials
IDV
LVHI
Basic Materials
IDV
LVHI
Real Estate
IDV
LVHI
Technology
IDV
LVHI
Healthcare
IDV
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
LVHI
IDV vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.61 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 5.12 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 21.20 | -7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDV vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -32.31% | -37.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -6.08% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -11.99% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -11.99% | -17.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -1.31% | -3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.37% | -3.51% | -11.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.47% | +0.86% |
Volatility
IDV vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.66%. This indicates that IDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 2.66% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 7.70% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.12% | 9.63% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 11.07% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 13.75% | +4.17% |
IDV vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than LVHI's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 5.40% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.75% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and LVHI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDV has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to LVHI (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.85% vs 12.32% for IDV. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 4.75% for LVHI.
IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDV and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer