IDV vs. PID
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IDV tracks the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend while PID tracks the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDV returned 10.77%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for PID. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
IDV vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has outperformed PID with an annualized return of 10.77%, while PID has yielded a comparatively lower 8.91% annualized return.
IDV
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
PID
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
IDV vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 10.34% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 2.80% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -6.48% | 24.49% | -6.56% | 25.87% | -11.46% | 19.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and PID is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IDV and PID shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDV vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
PID
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
IDV
PID
Energy
IDV
PID
Utilities
IDV
PID
Communication Services
IDV
PID
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
PID
Consumer Defensive
IDV
PID
Industrials
IDV
PID
Basic Materials
IDV
PID
Real Estate
IDV
PID
Technology
IDV
PID
Healthcare
IDV
-
PID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
PID
IDV vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.25 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 1.85 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.13 | 6.14 | +7.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDV vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than PID's maximum drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and PID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -66.34% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -7.47% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -13.34% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -22.97% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | -46.07% | +3.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.52% | -4.65% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.37% | -13.01% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.25% | +0.10% |
Volatility
IDV vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.70%. This indicates that IDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 2.70% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 7.86% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.14% | 9.84% | +3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 13.96% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 17.75% | +0.15% |
IDV vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than PID's 4.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 5.39% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 4.82% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and PID have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDV has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to PID (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs PID's -66.34%.
On 10-year performance, IDV leads with 10.77% vs 8.91% for PID. On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDV has performed better with a 10.77% return vs 8.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 4.82% for PID.
IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.56% for PID.
IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDV and PID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer