PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -55.85% return.


NOBL

1D
-1.15%
1M
1.76%
6M
5.17%
YTD
9.33%
1Y
12.04%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
9.56%

BITU

1D
7.33%
1M
0.28%
6M
-61.77%
YTD
-55.85%
1Y
-79.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
9.33%6.84%0.52%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-55.85%-37.07%41.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and BITU is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBLBITUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.80

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

-0.96

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

-1.41

+4.77

NOBL vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -83.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-83.45%

+48.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-83.45%

+74.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-80.26%

+77.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-36.64%

+33.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

56.45%

-52.86%

Volatility

NOBL vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 4.11%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 23.07%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

23.07%

-18.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

70.52%

-61.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

88.40%

-76.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

96.89%

-82.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

96.89%

-80.29%

NOBL vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than BITU's 87.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
87.36%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.07%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBL and BITU have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (23.07%) compared to NOBL (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs BITU's -83.45%.

On 1-year performance, NOBL leads with 12.04% vs -79.57% for BITU. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 12.04% return vs -79.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 87.36%, compared with 2.07% for NOBL.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.95% for BITU.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer