PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITU vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITU vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITU achieves a -52.92% return, which is significantly lower than IBIT's -25.48% return.


BITU

1D
-5.58%
1M
-34.84%
YTD
-52.92%
6M
-59.11%
1Y
-73.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITU vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-52.92%-37.07%37.90%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-6.41%41.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BITU and IBIT is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

1.00

The correlation between BITU and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITU vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITU vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITUIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.84

-0.89

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.44

-1.23

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.86

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

-0.79

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.47

-1.36

-0.10

BITU vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITU Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITU and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITUIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

-0.89

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

0.30

-0.64

Drawdowns

BITU vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITU drawdown since its inception was -78.94%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITU and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITUIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.94%

-49.36%

-29.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.94%

-49.36%

-29.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.94%

-48.10%

-30.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-16.02%

-18.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.84%

28.44%

+21.40%

Volatility

BITU vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a higher volatility of 18.99% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 9.50%. This indicates that BITU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITUIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.99%

9.50%

+9.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.41%

34.44%

+34.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.00%

43.73%

+43.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.45%

50.19%

+47.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.45%

50.19%

+47.26%

BITU vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITU vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.36%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
83.36%50.23%0.12%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, BITU and IBIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to IBIT (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITU dropped -78.94% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, IBIT leads with -38.74% vs -73.07% for BITU. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 9.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIT has performed better with a -38.74% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITU and 0.25% for IBIT.

BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITU and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer