BITU vs. IBIT
BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITU tracks the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross while IBIT tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BITU returned -73.07% vs -38.74% for IBIT. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BITU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
BITU vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITU achieves a -52.92% return, which is significantly lower than IBIT's -25.48% return.
BITU
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -34.84%
- YTD
- -52.92%
- 6M
- -59.11%
- 1Y
- -73.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITU vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -52.92% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 41.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITU and IBIT is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between BITU and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITU vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
BITU
IBIT
BITU vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | -0.89 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | -1.23 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.86 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.79 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | -1.36 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | -0.89 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.30 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
BITU vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITU drawdown since its inception was -78.94%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITU and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.94% | -49.36% | -29.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.94% | -49.36% | -29.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.94% | -48.10% | -30.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -16.02% | -18.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.84% | 28.44% | +21.40% |
Volatility
BITU vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a higher volatility of 18.99% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 9.50%. This indicates that BITU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.99% | 9.50% | +9.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.41% | 34.44% | +34.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.00% | 43.73% | +43.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.45% | 50.19% | +47.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.45% | 50.19% | +47.26% |
BITU vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITU vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.36%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 83.36% | 50.23% | 0.12% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, BITU and IBIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to IBIT (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITU dropped -78.94% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, IBIT leads with -38.74% vs -73.07% for BITU. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 9.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIT has performed better with a -38.74% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITU and 0.25% for IBIT.
BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITU and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer