BITU vs. CONL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) and CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CONL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. BITU is passively managed, while CONL is actively managed. Over the past year, BITU returned -70.45% vs -74.16% for CONL. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for CONL.

Performance

BITU vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITU achieves a -50.14% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -56.79% return.

BITU

• 1D: -11.77%
• 1M: -28.10%
• YTD: -50.14%
• 6M: -54.90%
• 1Y: -70.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONL

• 1D: -9.57%
• 1M: -21.27%
• YTD: -56.79%
• 6M: -68.91%
• 1Y: -74.16%
• 3Y*: -11.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITU vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	-50.14%	-37.07%	37.90%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-56.79%	-58.49%	-46.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BITU and CONL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024	0.72

The correlation between BITU and CONL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITU vs. CONL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BITU	CONL
Financial Services	4.2%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BITU vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITU

BITU Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 4
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITU vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITU	CONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	-0.54	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.30	-0.43	-0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.95	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	-0.81	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	-1.13	-0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITU vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITU Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITU and CONL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITU	CONL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	-0.54	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	-0.18	-0.15

Drawdowns

BITU vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITU drawdown since its inception was -77.76%, smaller than the maximum CONL drawdown of -93.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITU and CONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITU	CONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.76%	-93.95%	+16.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.76%	-92.02%	+14.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-93.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.70%	-92.57%	+14.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.41%	-55.91%	+21.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.59%	65.48%	-15.89%

Volatility

BITU vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) is 19.53%, while GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a volatility of 38.63%. This indicates that BITU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITU	CONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.53%	38.63%	-19.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.19%	100.69%	-30.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	86.84%	138.87%	-52.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	97.46%	149.87%	-52.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	97.46%	149.87%	-52.41%

BITU vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CONL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITU vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.71%, while CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	78.71%	50.23%	0.12%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITU and CONL in my portfolio?

BITU and CONL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITU or CONL?

CONL has higher volatility (38.63%) compared to BITU (19.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITU dropped -77.76% vs CONL's -93.95%.

Which ETF is better, BITU or CONL?

On 1-year performance, BITU leads with -70.45% vs -74.16% for CONL. On fees, BITU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITU has been the lower-risk option at 19.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITU or CONL?

Over the 1-year period, BITU has performed better with a -70.45% return vs -74.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITU or CONL?

BITU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITU or CONL?

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 78.71%, compared with 0.00% for CONL.

What is the main difference between BITU and CONL?

BITU is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CONL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITU and 1.15% for CONL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CONL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.