NOBL vs. AMDY
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while AMDY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. NOBL is passively managed, while AMDY is actively managed. Over the past year, NOBL returned 9.00% vs 240.44% for AMDY. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDY.
Performance
NOBL vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 110.49% return.
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
AMDY
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- 46.76%
- YTD
- 110.49%
- 6M
- 111.80%
- 1Y
- 240.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.51% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 4.13% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 110.49% | 53.93% | -17.00% | 26.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and AMDY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.19 |
The correlation between NOBL and AMDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOBL vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank
NOBL
AMDY
NOBL vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOBL | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.64 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 8.77 | -7.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 19.77 | -17.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOBL | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 4.53 | -3.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.25 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and AMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBL | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -53.92% | +18.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -27.59% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.99% | 0.00% | -5.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -18.02% | +14.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 12.22% | -8.72% |
Volatility
NOBL vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 2.36%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.81%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOBL | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 20.81% | -18.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.00% | 39.99% | -31.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.33% | 53.40% | -42.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 46.01% | -31.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 46.01% | -29.41% |
NOBL vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOBL vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than AMDY's 54.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 54.91% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOBL and AMDY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs AMDY's -53.92%.
On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 9.00% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.
AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.
NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.99% for AMDY.
AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOBL and AMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer