PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDY vs. CONY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDY achieves a 87.43% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -31.56% return.


AMDY

1D
-1.50%
1M
-8.47%
6M
81.07%
YTD
87.43%
1Y
133.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.02%

CONY

1D
-9.82%
1M
-8.17%
6M
-20.90%
YTD
-31.56%
1Y
-49.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.93M$23.50M$23.54M
$6.79M$6.47M$10.17M

AMDY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
87.43%53.93%-17.00%25.92%
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-31.56%-26.34%23.62%68.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDY and CONY is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMDY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDYCONYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.82

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

-0.97

+5.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

-1.49

+11.51

AMDY vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDY Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDY and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDY drawdown since its inception was -53.92%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDY and CONY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDYCONYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.92%

-63.57%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.59%

-59.52%

+31.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.82%

-61.23%

+45.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.40%

-24.13%

+6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.72%

39.88%

-27.16%

Volatility

AMDY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a higher volatility of 21.43% compared to YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) at 16.98%. This indicates that AMDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDYCONYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.43%

16.98%

+4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.49%

46.95%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.09%

59.51%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.06%

59.91%

-11.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.06%

59.91%

-11.85%

AMDY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDY has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than CONY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 76.77%, less than CONY's 171.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
76.77%80.68%109.98%6.68%
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
171.52%192.07%155.66%16.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDY and CONY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (21.43%) compared to CONY (16.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDY dropped -53.92% vs CONY's -63.57%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 133.24% vs -49.35% for CONY. On fees, CONY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, CONY has been the lower-risk option at 16.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 133.24% return vs -49.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CONY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 171.52%, compared with 76.77% for AMDY.

Their fees differ too: 1.23% for AMDY and 0.99% for CONY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDY and CONY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer