AMDY vs. FBY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) and FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDY returned 221.30% vs -16.04% for FBY. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMDY charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FBY.

Performance

AMDY vs. FBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDY achieves a 111.33% return, which is significantly higher than FBY's -13.45% return.

AMDY

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 13.75%
• YTD: 111.33%
• 6M: 112.18%
• 1Y: 221.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBY

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: -7.09%
• YTD: -13.45%
• 6M: -13.14%
• 1Y: -16.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDY vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	111.33%	53.93%	-17.00%	25.92%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-13.45%	1.98%	44.42%	20.55%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDY and FBY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023	0.37

The correlation between AMDY and FBY shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMDY vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 92
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDY vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDY	FBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.98	-0.54	+4.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.03	-0.59	+4.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	0.92	+0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.07	-0.55	+8.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.01	-1.12	+19.13

AMDY vs. FBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDY Sharpe Ratio is 3.98, which is higher than the FBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDY and FBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMDY vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDY drawdown since its inception was -53.92%, which is greater than FBY's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDY and FBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDY	FBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.92%	-31.53%	-22.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.59%	-29.50%	+1.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-25.62%	+25.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.79%	-8.07%	-9.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.34%	14.37%	-2.03%

Volatility

AMDY vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a higher volatility of 20.60% compared to YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) at 10.26%. This indicates that AMDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDY	FBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.60%	10.26%	+10.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.29%	23.35%	+19.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.05%	29.66%	+26.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.87%	28.67%	+18.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.87%	28.67%	+18.20%

AMDY vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDY has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FBY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDY vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison

AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.77%, more than FBY's 57.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	62.77%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	57.95%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDY and FBY in my portfolio?

AMDY and FBY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDY or FBY?

AMDY has higher volatility (20.60%) compared to FBY (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDY dropped -53.92% vs FBY's -31.53%.

Which ETF is better, AMDY or FBY?

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 221.30% vs -16.04% for FBY. On fees, FBY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, FBY has been the lower-risk option at 10.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDY or FBY?

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 221.30% return vs -16.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDY or FBY?

FBY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDY or FBY?

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 62.77%, compared with 57.95% for FBY.

What is the main difference between AMDY and FBY?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax ETFs and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for AMDY and 0.99% for FBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.