MVV vs. FNGO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO).
MVV and FNGO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MVV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. FNGO is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). It was launched on Aug 1, 2018. Both MVV and FNGO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MVV vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MVV vs. FNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 4.75% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 48.57% | 6.20% | 49.50% | -31.24% |
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | -22.92% | 25.49% | 101.65% | 240.10% | -71.55% | 28.38% | 238.00% | 79.61% | -40.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than FNGO's -22.92% return.
MVV
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
FNGO
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- -22.92%
- 6M
- -28.65%
- 1Y
- 28.52%
- 3Y*
- 52.54%
- 5Y*
- 18.17%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MVV vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MVV and FNGO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
MVV vs. FNGO — Risk / Return Rank
MVV
FNGO
MVV vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVV | FNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 0.74 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 2.08 | +1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVV | FNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.30 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between MVV and FNGO is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MVV vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison
MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.81% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MVV vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than FNGO's maximum drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and FNGO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVV | FNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -78.39% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.85% | -42.73% | +15.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.53% | -78.39% | +32.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.34% | -35.78% | +24.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | -24.17% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.97% | 15.17% | -8.20% |
Volatility
MVV vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 12.99%, while MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a volatility of 16.20%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MVV | FNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 16.20% | -3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.02% | 30.54% | -6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.30% | 54.60% | -11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.66% | 60.29% | -20.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.32% | 61.90% | -19.58% |