PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGO vs. MAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGO vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGO vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
-22.92%25.49%60.05%
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
-23.25%26.16%81.14%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNGO having a -22.92% return and MAGX slightly lower at -23.25%.


FNGO

1D
2.95%
1M
-8.44%
YTD
-22.92%
6M
-28.65%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
52.54%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*

MAGX

1D
2.69%
1M
-10.34%
YTD
-23.25%
6M
-21.67%
1Y
37.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGO vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNGO and MAGX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

FNGO vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO
FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGOMAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.53

0.67

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

1.33

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.16

-0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.08

3.66

-1.58

FNGO vs. MAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the MAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and MAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGOMAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

0.67

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.57

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and MAGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNGO vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison

FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.


Drawdowns

FNGO vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than MAGX's maximum drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and MAGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGOMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.39%

-54.19%

-24.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.73%

-37.24%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.78%

-29.46%

-6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-14.08%

-10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.17%

11.80%

+3.37%

Volatility

FNGO vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) have volatilities of 16.20% and 16.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGOMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.20%

16.99%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.54%

31.00%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.60%

57.15%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.29%

54.60%

+5.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.90%

54.60%

+7.30%