PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGO vs. FNGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGO vs. FNGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGO vs. FNGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
-22.92%25.49%101.65%240.10%-71.55%9.96%
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
-23.23%27.21%98.76%204.23%-87.15%-3.07%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNGO having a -22.92% return and FNGG slightly lower at -23.23%.


FNGO

1D
2.95%
1M
-8.44%
YTD
-22.92%
6M
-28.65%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
52.54%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*

FNGG

1D
3.06%
1M
-8.46%
YTD
-23.23%
6M
-28.21%
1Y
27.59%
3Y*
52.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGO vs. FNGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGG's 0.98% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNGO vs. FNGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO
FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGG
FNGG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FNGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. FNGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGOFNGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.53

0.51

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.73

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.08

2.07

+0.02

FNGO vs. FNGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the FNGG Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and FNGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGOFNGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

0.51

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.10

+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and FNGG is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNGO vs. FNGG - Dividend Comparison

FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%.


TTM20252024202320222021
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
15.44%11.89%0.79%0.88%0.00%4.99%

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. FNGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, smaller than the maximum FNGG drawdown of -91.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and FNGG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGOFNGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.39%

-91.33%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.73%

-43.01%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.78%

-43.22%

+7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-57.35%

+33.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.17%

15.21%

-0.04%

Volatility

FNGO vs. FNGG - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) have volatilities of 16.20% and 16.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGOFNGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.20%

16.13%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.54%

30.53%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.60%

54.17%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.29%

68.39%

-8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.90%

68.39%

-6.49%