PortfoliosLab logo
FNGO vs. FNGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and FNGS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FNGO vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNGO:

0.79

FNGS:

1.01

Sortino Ratio

FNGO:

1.32

FNGS:

1.43

Omega Ratio

FNGO:

1.17

FNGS:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

FNGO:

0.94

FNGS:

1.12

Martin Ratio

FNGO:

2.46

FNGS:

3.24

Ulcer Index

FNGO:

18.30%

FNGS:

9.24%

Daily Std Dev

FNGO:

65.28%

FNGS:

32.59%

Max Drawdown

FNGO:

-78.39%

FNGS:

-48.98%

Current Drawdown

FNGO:

-9.72%

FNGS:

-2.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 4.20% return.


FNGO

YTD

1.48%

1M

14.70%

6M

13.28%

1Y

52.53%

3Y*

63.27%

5Y*

45.38%

10Y*

N/A

FNGS

YTD

4.20%

1M

7.25%

6M

11.14%

1Y

33.83%

3Y*

37.54%

5Y*

29.02%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MicroSectors FANG+ ETN

FNGO vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNGO vs. FNGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGO is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGO is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGO is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGO is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGO is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGO is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGS is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGS is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNGO vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FNGO vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGO nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and FNGS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FNGO vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 13.06% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 7.17%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...