MVV vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
MVV and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MVV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both MVV and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MVV or VOO.
Key characteristics
| MVV | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.57% | 11.83% |
| 1Y Return | 48.37% | 31.13% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.65% | 10.03% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.58% | 15.07% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.80% | 13.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Daily Std Dev | 31.53% | 11.62% |
| Max Drawdown | -85.54% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.61% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVV and VOO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MVV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MVV having a 12.80% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 13.02%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MVV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MVV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MVV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than VOO's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.53% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.32% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
MVV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MVV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.49%. This indicates that MVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.