Correlation
The correlation between FNGO and QLD is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
FNGO vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
FNGO and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGO is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). It was launched on Aug 1, 2018. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both FNGO and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNGO or QLD.
Performance
FNGO vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FNGO:
0.79
QLD:
0.35
FNGO:
1.32
QLD:
0.73
FNGO:
1.17
QLD:
1.10
FNGO:
0.94
QLD:
0.32
FNGO:
2.46
QLD:
0.92
FNGO:
18.30%
QLD:
14.82%
FNGO:
65.28%
QLD:
50.74%
FNGO:
-78.39%
QLD:
-83.13%
FNGO:
-9.72%
QLD:
-12.84%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -3.22% return.
FNGO
1.48%
14.70%
13.28%
52.53%
63.27%
45.38%
N/A
QLD
-3.22%
11.96%
-3.14%
17.80%
27.80%
26.33%
27.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGO vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNGO and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNGO vs. QLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FNGO
QLD
FNGO vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FNGO vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.23% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.90% | 0.11% | 0.19% |
Drawdowns
FNGO vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and QLD.
Loading data...
Volatility
FNGO vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 13.06% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 11.09%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...