MTB vs. CBU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU).

Performance

MTB vs. CBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MTB vs. CBU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTB M&T Bank Corporation	3.31%	10.89%	41.66%	-1.68%	-2.94%	24.28%	-22.16%	21.65%	-14.58%	11.35%
CBU Community Bank System, Inc.	2.95%	-3.84%	22.61%	-14.17%	-13.16%	22.28%	-9.59%	24.69%	11.06%	-10.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MTB : $32.36B CBU : $3.29B
EPS MTB : $18.08 CBU : $3.89
PE Ratio MTB : 11.43 CBU : 15.07
PEG Ratio MTB : 1.54 CBU : 2.35
PS Ratio MTB : 2.65 CBU : 3.41
PB Ratio MTB : 1.23 CBU : 1.64
Total Revenue (TTM) MTB : $12.31B CBU : $928.71M
Gross Profit (TTM) MTB : $9.19B CBU : $682.00M
EBITDA (TTM) MTB : $3.96B CBU : $317.25M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTB achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly higher than CBU's 2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MTB has outperformed CBU with an annualized return of 9.39%, while CBU has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.

MTB

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: 3.31%
• 6M: 6.17%
• 1Y: 19.14%
• 3Y*: 24.27%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: 9.39%

CBU

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 2.95%
• 6M: 1.63%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: 7.40%
• 5Y*: -2.37%
• 10Y*: 7.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MTB vs. CBU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTB

MTB Risk / Return Rank: 65
MTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MTB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
MTB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CBU

CBU Risk / Return Rank: 48
CBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
CBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CBU Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CBU Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTB vs. CBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTB	CBU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	0.24	+0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	0.54	+0.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.07	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	0.42	+0.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.24	0.99	+2.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTB vs. CBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTB Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the CBU Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTB and CBU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTB	CBU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	0.24	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	-0.08	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.24	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.33	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between MTB and CBU is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MTB vs. CBU - Dividend Comparison

MTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than CBU's 3.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTB M&T Bank Corporation	2.83%	3.24%	2.85%	3.79%	3.31%	2.93%	3.46%	2.42%	2.48%	1.75%	1.79%	2.31%
CBU Community Bank System, Inc.	3.19%	3.24%	2.95%	3.42%	2.76%	2.28%	2.66%	2.23%	2.47%	2.46%	2.04%	3.05%

Drawdowns

MTB vs. CBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTB drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, which is greater than CBU's maximum drawdown of -61.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTB and CBU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTB	CBU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.50%	-61.07%	-12.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.98%	-16.03%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.71%	-50.47%	+9.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.97%	-51.04%	-1.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.54%	-16.85%	+4.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.43%	-14.58%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.64%	6.77%	-0.13%

Volatility

MTB vs. CBU - Volatility Comparison

M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) at 5.38%. This indicates that MTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTB	CBU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.73%	5.38%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.46%	17.21%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.27%	27.28%	-1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.46%	29.60%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.85%	30.08%	+2.77%

Financials

MTB vs. CBU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between M&T Bank Corporation and Community Bank System, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MTB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, M&T Bank Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.35B and revenue of 3.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.

CBU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Community Bank System, Inc. reported a gross profit of 95.81M and revenue of 181.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.8%.

MTB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, M&T Bank Corporation reported an operating income of 971.00M and revenue of 3.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

CBU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Community Bank System, Inc. reported an operating income of 88.18M and revenue of 181.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.6%.

MTB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, M&T Bank Corporation reported a net income of 759.00M and revenue of 3.33B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

CBU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Community Bank System, Inc. reported a net income of 54.42M and revenue of 181.47M, resulting in a net margin of 30.0%.