PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTB vs. FIBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTB vs. FIBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTB achieves a 23.95% return, which is significantly higher than FIBK's 12.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MTB has outperformed FIBK with an annualized return of 11.37%, while FIBK has yielded a comparatively lower 7.56% annualized return.


MTB

1D
-0.29%
1M
3.10%
6M
12.71%
YTD
23.95%
1Y
37.09%
3Y*
25.24%
5Y*
16.71%
10Y*
11.37%
ALL TIME*
12.29%

FIBK

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.89%
6M
9.92%
YTD
12.68%
1Y
41.52%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
7.56%
ALL TIME*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.66M$47.81M$43.41M
$294.32M$288.80M$256.33M

MTB vs. FIBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
23.95%10.89%41.66%-1.68%-2.94%24.28%-22.16%21.65%-14.58%11.35%
FIBK
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
12.68%13.46%12.94%-14.79%-0.78%3.58%3.20%18.20%-6.22%-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MTB and FIBK is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2010

0.65

The correlation between MTB and FIBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTB:

$35.70B

FIBK:

$3.69B

EPS

MTB:

$19.37

FIBK:

$3.24

PE Ratio

MTB:

12.71

FIBK:

11.74

PEG Ratio

MTB:

1.71

FIBK:

3.80

PS Ratio

MTB:

3.10

FIBK:

3.99

PB Ratio

MTB:

1.38

FIBK:

1.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTB:

$12.43B

FIBK:

$953.30M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTB:

$9.45B

FIBK:

$792.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

MTB:

$4.36B

FIBK:

$352.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTB vs. FIBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTB
MTB Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FIBK
FIBK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FIBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIBK Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FIBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIBK Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTB vs. FIBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTBFIBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.36

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

6.02

-1.01

MTB vs. FIBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FIBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTB and FIBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTB vs. FIBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTB drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, which is greater than FIBK's maximum drawdown of -52.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTB and FIBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTBFIBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.50%

-52.45%

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.98%

-16.87%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

-31.76%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.71%

-50.90%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.97%

-52.45%

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-5.47%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-14.55%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

6.61%

+0.28%

Volatility

MTB vs. FIBK - Volatility Comparison

M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) at 6.10%. This indicates that MTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTBFIBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

6.10%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.19%

18.00%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.94%

27.81%

-5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.07%

33.39%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.73%

32.95%

-0.22%

Dividends

MTB vs. FIBK - Dividend Comparison

MTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than FIBK's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIBK
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
4.94%5.43%5.79%6.11%4.40%4.03%4.91%2.96%3.06%2.40%2.07%2.75%
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
2.44%3.24%2.85%3.79%3.31%2.93%3.46%2.42%2.48%1.75%1.79%2.31%

Financials

MTB vs. FIBK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between M&T Bank Corporation and First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MTB and FIBK have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTB has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to FIBK (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTB dropped -73.50% vs FIBK's -52.45%.

MTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTB and FIBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer