PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU vs. AMSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBU vs. AMSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) and AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than AMSF's -16.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CBU has outperformed AMSF with an annualized return of 7.79%, while AMSF has yielded a comparatively lower 0.36% annualized return.


CBU

1D
1.86%
1M
0.86%
YTD
12.26%
6M
8.68%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
-0.74%
10Y*
7.79%

AMSF

1D
0.26%
1M
2.45%
YTD
-16.14%
6M
-17.62%
1Y
-22.56%
3Y*
-8.17%
5Y*
-4.38%
10Y*
0.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBU vs. AMSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBU
Community Bank System, Inc.
12.26%-3.84%22.61%-14.17%-13.16%22.28%-9.59%24.69%11.06%-10.90%
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-16.14%-20.78%19.62%-0.86%6.13%2.00%-6.09%24.48%-6.63%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CBU and AMSF is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2005

0.47

The correlation between CBU and AMSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBU:

$3.36B

AMSF:

$592.31M

EPS

CBU:

$4.05

AMSF:

$2.44

PE Ratio

CBU:

15.67

AMSF:

12.88

PS Ratio

CBU:

3.62

AMSF:

1.84

PB Ratio

CBU:

1.66

AMSF:

0.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBU:

$943.58M

AMSF:

$324.77M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBU:

$700.09M

AMSF:

$120.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

CBU:

$320.27M

AMSF:

$48.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBU vs. AMSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU
CBU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

AMSF
AMSF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
AMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU vs. AMSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) and AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUAMSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.86

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

-0.67

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

-1.22

+4.34

CBU vs. AMSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the AMSF Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU and AMSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBU vs. AMSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU drawdown since its inception was -61.07%, which is greater than AMSF's maximum drawdown of -43.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU and AMSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUAMSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.07%

-43.35%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-33.66%

+17.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.19%

-43.35%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.07%

-43.35%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.04%

-43.35%

-7.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.33%

-39.12%

+29.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-12.38%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

18.54%

-11.74%

Volatility

CBU vs. AMSF - Volatility Comparison

Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) at 5.98%. This indicates that CBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUAMSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

5.98%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.25%

21.77%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.85%

26.40%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.53%

24.74%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.11%

27.02%

+3.09%

Dividends

CBU vs. AMSF - Dividend Comparison

CBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than AMSF's 8.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
8.28%6.66%8.69%10.39%10.08%9.59%7.97%6.82%1.55%1.30%6.37%7.07%
CBU
Community Bank System, Inc.
2.96%3.24%2.95%3.42%2.76%2.28%2.66%2.23%2.47%2.46%2.04%3.05%

Financials

CBU vs. AMSF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Community Bank System, Inc. and AMERISAFE, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
258.56M
80.09M
(CBU) Total Revenue
(AMSF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CBU vs. AMSF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Community Bank System, Inc. and AMERISAFE, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
80.3%
0
Portfolio components
CBU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Community Bank System, Inc. reported a gross profit of 207.65M and revenue of 258.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.3%.

AMSF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMERISAFE, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 80.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CBU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Community Bank System, Inc. reported an operating income of 74.61M and revenue of 258.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.

AMSF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMERISAFE, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 80.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CBU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Community Bank System, Inc. reported a net income of 57.22M and revenue of 258.56M, resulting in a net margin of 22.1%.

AMSF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMERISAFE, Inc. reported a net income of 8.15M and revenue of 80.09M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBU and AMSF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBU has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to AMSF (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBU dropped -61.07% vs AMSF's -43.35%.

CBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBU and AMSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer