MTB vs. IAT
MTB (M&T Bank Corporation) is a stock, while IAT (iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index. Over the past 10 years, MTB returned 10.44%/yr vs 9.56%/yr for IAT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
MTB vs. IAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTB achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than IAT's 10.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MTB has outperformed IAT with an annualized return of 10.44%, while IAT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.56% annualized return.
MTB
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 29.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
IAT
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 31.68%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
MTB vs. IAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 14.61% | 10.89% | 41.66% | -1.68% | -2.94% | 24.28% | -22.16% | 21.65% | -14.58% | 11.35% |
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 10.17% | 13.05% | 24.36% | -8.53% | -20.61% | 38.89% | -7.60% | 31.38% | -17.45% | 10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTB and IAT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MTB and IAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTB vs. IAT — Risk / Return Rank
MTB
IAT
MTB vs. IAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTB | IAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.82 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.71 | 4.63 | -0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTB vs. IAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTB drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, roughly equal to the maximum IAT drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTB and IAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTB | IAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.50% | -77.22% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.98% | -17.49% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.20% | -29.29% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.71% | -55.55% | +14.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.97% | -55.55% | +2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -3.29% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -26.92% | +14.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 6.87% | +0.34% |
Volatility
MTB vs. IAT - Volatility Comparison
M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) have volatilities of 6.61% and 6.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTB | IAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 6.69% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 16.07% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 22.01% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 28.95% | +1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 30.81% | +2.05% |
Dividends
MTB vs. IAT - Dividend Comparison
MTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than IAT's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 2.69% | 2.94% | 2.95% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 1.88% | 2.87% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.78% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 2.63% | 3.24% | 2.85% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.93% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 1.75% | 1.79% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, MTB and IAT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IAT has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to MTB (6.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTB dropped -73.50% vs IAT's -77.22%.
IAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTB and IAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer