MTB vs. IAT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT).

IAT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006.

Performance

MTB vs. IAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MTB vs. IAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTB M&T Bank Corporation	4.44%	10.89%	41.66%	-1.68%	-2.94%	24.28%	-22.16%	21.65%	-14.58%	11.35%
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	-0.74%	13.05%	24.36%	-8.53%	-20.61%	38.89%	-7.60%	31.38%	-17.45%	10.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTB achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than IAT's -0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MTB has outperformed IAT with an annualized return of 9.51%, while IAT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.44% annualized return.

MTB

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -4.79%
• YTD: 4.44%
• 6M: 8.61%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 24.72%
• 5Y*: 9.94%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

IAT

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -3.57%
• YTD: -0.74%
• 6M: 6.21%
• 1Y: 21.64%
• 3Y*: 19.10%
• 5Y*: 2.18%
• 10Y*: 8.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MTB vs. IAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTB

MTB Risk / Return Rank: 65
MTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
MTB Omega Ratio Rank: 62
MTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MTB Martin Ratio Rank: 67

IAT

IAT Risk / Return Rank: 40
IAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
IAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IAT Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IAT Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTB vs. IAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTB	IAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.80	+0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	1.18	+0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.18	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	1.17	+0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.06	3.07	-0.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTB vs. IAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTB Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the IAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTB and IAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTB	IAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	0.80	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.08	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.27	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.09	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between MTB and IAT is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MTB vs. IAT - Dividend Comparison

MTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than IAT's 2.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTB M&T Bank Corporation	2.80%	3.24%	2.85%	3.79%	3.31%	2.93%	3.46%	2.42%	2.48%	1.75%	1.79%	2.31%
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	2.98%	2.94%	2.95%	3.56%	3.12%	1.88%	2.87%	2.49%	2.48%	1.55%	1.52%	1.78%

Drawdowns

MTB vs. IAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTB drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, roughly equal to the maximum IAT drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTB and IAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTB	IAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.50%	-77.22%	+3.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.98%	-17.49%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.71%	-55.55%	+14.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.97%	-55.55%	+2.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.59%	-12.86%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.43%	-27.13%	+14.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.68%	6.67%	+0.01%

Volatility

MTB vs. IAT - Volatility Comparison

M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) at 6.04%. This indicates that MTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTB	IAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	6.04%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.49%	16.97%	-0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.22%	27.32%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.46%	29.09%	+1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.84%	30.79%	+2.05%