PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTB vs. C
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MTBC
YTD Return59.71%37.42%
1Y Return76.54%57.50%
3Y Return (Ann)13.81%3.83%
5Y Return (Ann)8.99%2.09%
10Y Return (Ann)8.49%5.22%
Sharpe Ratio2.762.24
Sortino Ratio3.803.04
Omega Ratio1.471.38
Calmar Ratio2.420.67
Martin Ratio19.2210.85
Ulcer Index4.13%5.47%
Daily Std Dev28.71%26.47%
Max Drawdown-73.50%-98.00%
Current Drawdown-1.52%-82.48%

Fundamentals


MTBC
Market Cap$35.38B$132.01B
EPS$13.52$3.47
PE Ratio15.7719.89
PEG Ratio1.370.77
Total Revenue (TTM)$12.37B$103.57B
Gross Profit (TTM)$12.37B$58.17B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.59B$17.24B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MTB and C is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MTB vs. C - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MTB achieves a 59.71% return, which is significantly higher than C's 37.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MTB has outperformed C with an annualized return of 8.49%, while C has yielded a comparatively lower 5.22% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
41.33%
8.23%
MTB
C

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTB vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTB, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTB, currently valued at 3.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MTB, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTB, currently valued at 2.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MTB, currently valued at 19.22, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0019.22
C
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for C, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for C, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for C, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for C, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for C, currently valued at 10.85, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0010.85

MTB vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTB and C, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.76
2.24
MTB
C

Dividends

MTB vs. C - Dividend Comparison

MTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than C's 3.20% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
2.49%3.79%3.31%2.93%3.46%2.42%2.48%1.75%1.79%2.31%2.23%2.41%
C
Citigroup Inc.
3.20%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%0.07%0.08%

Drawdowns

MTB vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTB drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTB and C. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.52%
-82.48%
MTB
C

Volatility

MTB vs. C - Volatility Comparison

M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) has a higher volatility of 14.15% compared to Citigroup Inc. (C) at 10.80%. This indicates that MTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.15%
10.80%
MTB
C

Financials

MTB vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between M&T Bank Corporation and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items