PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU vs. ES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBU vs. ES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) and Eversource Energy (ES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than ES's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CBU has outperformed ES with an annualized return of 7.79%, while ES has yielded a comparatively lower 5.67% annualized return.


CBU

1D
1.86%
1M
0.86%
YTD
12.26%
6M
8.68%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
-0.74%
10Y*
7.79%

ES

1D
0.76%
1M
0.17%
YTD
6.49%
6M
8.57%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
5.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBU vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBU
Community Bank System, Inc.
12.26%-3.84%22.61%-14.17%-13.16%22.28%-9.59%24.69%11.06%-10.90%
ES
Eversource Energy
6.49%22.86%-2.46%-23.43%-5.06%8.18%4.45%34.49%6.41%17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CBU and ES is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 1985

0.16

The correlation between CBU and ES shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBU:

$3.36B

ES:

$26.41B

EPS

CBU:

$4.05

ES:

$4.68

PE Ratio

CBU:

15.67

ES:

14.98

PEG Ratio

CBU:

2.44

ES:

0.85

PS Ratio

CBU:

3.62

ES:

1.88

PB Ratio

CBU:

1.66

ES:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBU:

$943.58M

ES:

$13.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBU:

$700.09M

ES:

$4.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

CBU:

$320.27M

ES:

$4.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBU vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU
CBU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ES
ES Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.15

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

2.74

+0.38

CBU vs. ES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the ES Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU and ES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBU vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU drawdown since its inception was -61.07%, smaller than the maximum ES drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU and ES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.07%

-73.04%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-15.13%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.19%

-28.65%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.07%

-41.69%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.04%

-41.69%

-9.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.33%

-11.51%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-19.06%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

6.32%

+0.48%

Volatility

CBU vs. ES - Volatility Comparison

Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Eversource Energy (ES) at 6.97%. This indicates that CBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

6.97%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.25%

16.06%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.85%

24.63%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.53%

23.89%

+5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.11%

24.37%

+5.74%

Dividends

CBU vs. ES - Dividend Comparison

CBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than ES's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBU
Community Bank System, Inc.
2.96%3.24%2.95%3.42%2.76%2.28%2.66%2.23%2.47%2.46%2.04%3.05%
ES
Eversource Energy
4.39%4.47%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%

Financials

CBU vs. ES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Community Bank System, Inc. and Eversource Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
258.56M
4.50B
(CBU) Total Revenue
(ES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CBU and ES have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBU has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to ES (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBU dropped -61.07% vs ES's -73.04%.

CBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBU and ES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer