PortfoliosLab logo
MTB vs. CFR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MTB and CFR is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MTB vs. CFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTB:

0.92

CFR:

0.94

Sortino Ratio

MTB:

1.44

CFR:

1.49

Omega Ratio

MTB:

1.19

CFR:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

MTB:

0.93

CFR:

0.83

Martin Ratio

MTB:

2.20

CFR:

3.30

Ulcer Index

MTB:

12.03%

CFR:

9.21%

Daily Std Dev

MTB:

29.87%

CFR:

32.23%

Max Drawdown

MTB:

-73.50%

CFR:

-56.86%

Current Drawdown

MTB:

-16.62%

CFR:

-12.62%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTB:

$29.37B

CFR:

$8.30B

EPS

MTB:

$15.06

CFR:

$9.10

PE Ratio

MTB:

12.15

CFR:

14.19

PEG Ratio

MTB:

28.64

CFR:

4.80

PS Ratio

MTB:

3.34

CFR:

4.07

PB Ratio

MTB:

1.10

CFR:

2.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTB:

$13.28B

CFR:

$2.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTB:

$8.76B

CFR:

$2.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

MTB:

$3.92B

CFR:

$797.98M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTB achieves a -2.17% return, which is significantly higher than CFR's -4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MTB has underperformed CFR with an annualized return of 7.08%, while CFR has yielded a comparatively higher 8.61% annualized return.


MTB

YTD

-2.17%

1M

7.59%

6M

-15.87%

1Y

27.29%

3Y*

3.65%

5Y*

15.09%

10Y*

7.08%

CFR

YTD

-4.01%

1M

9.87%

6M

-8.36%

1Y

30.02%

3Y*

3.73%

5Y*

14.17%

10Y*

8.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


M&T Bank Corporation

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTB vs. CFR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTB is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTB is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTB is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTB is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTB is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTB is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

CFR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CFR is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CFR is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CFR is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CFR is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CFR is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CFR is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTB vs. CFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MTB Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the CFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTB and CFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MTB vs. CFR - Dividend Comparison

MTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than CFR's 3.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
2.96%2.85%3.79%3.31%2.93%3.46%2.42%2.48%1.75%1.79%2.31%2.23%
CFR
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
3.76%2.79%3.30%2.42%2.33%3.27%2.86%2.93%2.38%2.44%3.50%2.87%

Drawdowns

MTB vs. CFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTB drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, which is greater than CFR's maximum drawdown of -56.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTB and CFR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MTB vs. CFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) is 7.45%, while Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that MTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MTB vs. CFR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between M&T Bank Corporation and Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20212022202320242025
3.17B
709.13M
(MTB) Total Revenue
(CFR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MTB vs. CFR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between M&T Bank Corporation and Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
68.6%
74.3%
(MTB) Gross Margin
(CFR) Gross Margin
MTB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, M&T Bank Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 3.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.6%.

CFR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. reported a gross profit of 527.16M and revenue of 709.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.3%.

MTB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, M&T Bank Corporation reported an operating income of 761.00M and revenue of 3.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

CFR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. reported an operating income of 179.10M and revenue of 709.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.

MTB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, M&T Bank Corporation reported a net income of 584.00M and revenue of 3.17B, resulting in a net margin of 18.4%.

CFR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. reported a net income of 150.92M and revenue of 709.13M, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.