MNST vs. FANG
MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) and FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. MNST operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, MNST returned 13.79%/yr vs 10.83%/yr for FANG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MNST vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 21.08% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 29.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 13.79%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.
MNST
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 8.17%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
FANG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 6M
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
MNST vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 21.08% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 42.74% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 29.28% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNST and FANG is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012 | 0.11 |
The correlation between MNST and FANG shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MNST:
$91.74B
FANG:
$54.33B
MNST:
$2.06
FANG:
$1.40
MNST:
45.05
FANG:
137.12
MNST:
10.41
FANG:
3.64
MNST:
10.51
FANG:
1.49
MNST:
$8.79B
FANG:
$15.19B
MNST:
$4.88B
FANG:
$7.30B
MNST:
$2.70B
FANG:
$5.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNST vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
MNST
FANG
MNST vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNST | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 2.56 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 4.99 | +2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNST vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and FANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNST | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.17% | -88.72% | +19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -12.53% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.04% | -42.10% | +16.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -42.10% | +15.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | -88.72% | +58.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.59% | +9.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.66% | -19.37% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 6.43% | -0.21% |
Volatility
MNST vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 5.50%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNST | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 11.03% | -5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.03% | 24.10% | -4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.43% | 31.48% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 37.99% | -13.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 49.05% | -22.80% |
Dividends
MNST vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.16% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MNST vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MNST vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MNST and FANG have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANG has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to MNST (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNST dropped -69.17% vs FANG's -88.72%.
MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNST and FANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer